"...eleminate the maoist leadrship by........." Are you trying to say that chop off the branches of the tree and the tree will be dead ? IF THE VICIOUS LEADERSHIP OF THE MAOIST MONSTERS IS ELIMINATED, IT WILL BE LIKE UPROOTING THE TREE. Until there is a political resolve to solve the centuries old deep social, political, economic, cultural and racial exclusion from the mainstream for much of the people in the Nepali society, counteless Baburams and Prachandas will continue to surge from beneath the generations old sufferings. SOCIAL INEQUALITY WILL NOT DISAPPEAR EVEN UNDER THE COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP. IT REQUIRES THE RULE OF LAW AND EDUCATION. WHAT DO YOU SAY TO THE COUNTLESS MILLION WHO WERE BUTCHERED BY THE POLPOT, OSTENSIBLY TO FIGHT AGAINST THE CENTURIES OLD SUFFERING OF THE DISADVANTAGED MAJORITY. COMMUNISM, ESPECIALLY MAOISM HAS NO PANAMACEA. And another thing is, are you trying to tell everyone that we should expect Gyane to enforce rule of law. Does he have moral ground to enforce the "rule of law" to every Nepali when his own son Paras is a burning example of "outlaw" with three cases of homocide or at least manslaughter. For the same offence in the US he would have been tried in the criminal court in the US with at least with "manslaughter" charges and a possible sentence of 20 years in jail for each offence. Should we belive that "Constitutional Monarchy" means free pass for manslaughter or homocide ? I CONDONE THE WAYWARDNESS OF PARASE. I WAS INDIGNANT WHEN PARAS WAS RUNNING BERSERK, INSTEAD OF SETTING ROYAL EXAMPLE. Your supposed "rule of law" by Gyane holds no water at all. So please dont make me laugh over here. GYANENDRA HAS NO OTHER BEST OPTION THAN TO BE CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH. OTHERWISE HE RISKS EXPOSING THE MONARCHY TO THE DANGER.. YOU TALK ABOUT THE COURT. WERE MAOISTS GIVEN LICENCE BY THE DEMOCRATIC COURTS TO KILL OPPONENT, BURN HOUSES, DESTROY THE PROPERTY AND TERRORIZE THE NATION WHEN THEY HAD ALL THE PEACEFUL MEANS TO CHANGE THE SOCIETY? WERE THEY PREVENTED BY GYANENDRA TO PROMOTE REPUBLICAN IDEA BY WINNING THE MAJORITY IN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION? THEY CHOSE TERROR AND VIOLENCE. IS THAT ABIDING BY THE RULE OF LAW? IF YOU ARE SO FOND OF USA, DOES US TOLERATE VIOLENT CRIMINALS TO TAKE OVER THE COUNTRY AT GUNPOINT?