Ashu writes: But after having read too much stuff on private property rights (even on cyberspace), I have found faults with my previous arguments, and have since changed my mind to say that: Sajha.com is a private property on which the host -- you -- welcome "sabai Nepali" to post stuff that may be of interest to other interested-in-Nepal visitors. People are free to either post stuff or not post anything and simply browse. -.-.-.-.-.-..-.-.-.-.-.-..-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-..-.-.-.-.-.-..- If this statement was written by San, he would surely have been called as an arrogant capatilist machine. This is the reason capitalist always have press secretary and lawyers who speaks on their behalf and later they can fire the old one and hire new and ask to tell the there was fault in his previous arguments. Thanks god its said by a poster, Ashu. Ashu as an investment advisor/consultant "read too much stuf on private property", I am wondering whether such statements are good if he insist public to digest. In my opinion, such statements should not have generated from peoples in high command or organization of Sajha.com level. In my personal opinion, saying "its San's property, he can do whatever likes to do", has devalued the "Sajha.com also belongs to us" feeling /sentiments. It surely had hurt, I understand that you tried shut these misusers, but its impact extends to others. This is how peoples express their anger when the owner of service provider start showing some arrogance over the feeling. Its good that San, himself has not said or showed the wording used by Ashu. GP