Ghampani ji, Here lies the difference between you and me mate. I dont believe in Rumsfeld, I believe in myself. I dont see Maoists as terrorist. Their act is terrorists act which has been propagated by the bullish act of the political parties, palace, and the security forces. No one is born as a maoists or terrorist.It's the conditions that make some one maoist. Do you belive in Rumsfeld? All the terrorists organisation who are launching attack on innocent civilians today are the product of American diplomacy after the 1950s. It were the Americans who armed Bin Laden and Taleban and other terrorist organisations at the first place. The Americans are rubbish(I mean the rulers) and give me no examples of them. No Nepalese would have been brutally killed by terrorists in Iraq if America had not invaded Baghdad. You know what I mean? America says it's fighting against the terrorists but many of the guns that terrorists possess today are american made. America incites and instigates conflict. Then sales arms to both parties. Now coming to Nepal. Why did you blame the Maoists only? Why don't you blame the king who enjoy extravagant life in the palace while public are having hard times to feed themselves? Why only blame the political parties? If you were in a remote village in Rolpa or Rukum, what option would you have beside carrying guns for the Maoists. Blame no Maoists my friend, blame no powerless people. The Maoists cadres who were ordered to burn down Meteor's home are ill-fated then us. They didn't have any options beside taking the arms for Maoists. Think what would have been your fate if you were born in Rolpa and Rukum. You would certainly become comrade Ghampani today. Guys, afno ghar jalyo bhanera sabai ko ghar jalos bhanne bichar na rakhau. We must think sensibly and force the King to accept for constituent assembly which will force the Maoists to join the mainstream. Hamro desh ko samashya ko mukhya churo Darbar ko atyadhik shakti sanchaya garne mansaya ho. If the palace agrees to be within the truly constitutional frame work, many problems can be eradicated. You just think yourself, if in your college where all of you pay equal fees but one or two individuals get extremely good facilities then you, will that be acceptable to you? Why should the King and the Queen and the Royals get that unnecessary privilege? The King and Paras and the Royals even don't know to speak proper Nepali. They wear clothes made in Japan and the US, jewels made in switzerland , drive German cars, watch English movies, have fun with foreigners, entertain in Casinos. Hamri Maharani le lagaune eutai sari lai dasau hajjar parchha sathi. She wears expensive jewelleris then what Queen elizabeth of Britain puts on. Elizabeth shops on supermarkets where middle class Britons shop. Have you ever seen Komal shopping in Newroad? See the contrast, the per capita income of Britain in nearly 30,000 dollars while Nepals is 200 dollars. WHy don't you see this thing as a problem? How could the Royals be more Nepalese then the garib maobadis. I sympathise on poor Nepalese, poor Maobadis. Not to the King and some aristrocrats. Unless the King is forced to give up his desire to become 'dui haat khutta bhako god' of the Nepali, the Maoists problem is not going to be solved. Maoists wont be finished off unless the structure of rule is changed. Blame Gyanendra not Maoists. I hope you got my point.