leaders are guilty of wrong and unlawful civil and political governance......citizens are guilty for silently accepting and not raising their voice....king is guilty of not being able to bring the consensus onboard...maobadi is guilty for taking advantage of the ill political situation and killing ppl. but anyways..dont u guys think..since 96, when maobadi...started escalading its violance and using their weapons .....not a single high portfolio leader has been murdered....so isnt it ovious that there is an unwritten agreement between the government and the leadership of maobadi..that they are not to engage in killing of the high profiled leader.....so just how does that make our leaders any differnt from them. and if these are the same leaders that has been handelling our "democracy" in nepal..for the last 13 yrs...and which some of us want is back so much after the intervention from the royal...just to give it back to the same leaders hand......well..is that right, or all we just want is democracy and like always..not be held responsible for how the democracy is governed or implemented....and who actually steers the democracy.