aayoo gorkhali (ani gayoo gorkharli) dude "..................................... why then do you force your opinion on the intrinsic matter.............." Well, same can be said against the opposing side of the debate as well..isn't it ? By the why, By its very nature, "opinion" can INFLUENCE a debate into making a favourable conclusion but CANNOT FORCE a debate into making a favorable conclusion. I'm confident that you know the difference between INFLUENCE and FORCE. It is hard to decide which one would be a feasible solution (in social-political experiment) until it is actually played out. One might see a perticular solution to be an absolute disaster while others might see it otherwise as it can been looked into with so many different prespectives. Well all know that we have experimented with "absolute monarchy" in Panchyat" then we experimented with "multi party democracy" . While we were still experimenting with "multi-party democracy" we were/are experimenting with "Socialist" version of Maoism on the side. Now at this point I guess at this point we are experimenting with "socialist" version of Maoism along with "absolute monarchy". From the past experience of NEpal. We can see that two experients cannot go together at the same time. Since we already experimented with "absolute monarchy" in Panchyat. I dont believe we need to repeat the same experiemnt. I believe "socialist" version of Maoism should be given a chance to be experimented in the Nepali society and see it if it really works or not. By the way, your personal remarks looks more realistic of some problem in your childhood otherwise you would counter my argument without dousing it with personal remarks isnt it ? aba (gayo gorkhali) ha ha ha ha