Presidentofnepal aka pres bainii.. let this be my last addressed sentence ending the fruitless quest for stinking humor. " am not surprised, at least; you do believe Maoists are brutal. But I have some arguments with your frivolous comments on Maoist being frank to admit their brutality. To some extend, I am confused; if that is a political humor or serious facts! As far as I know; "terrorism is the use of force and threats to frighten people into obeying completely." It means, in your own words; Maoist are frankly admitting that are terrorizing Nepali by taking the responsibility of such action no matter how poorly they justify their actions behind their act" ---------- Please refer to what i wrote. In your obsession to stick with your humor, you perhaps missed WHO wrote WHAT. Apart from me believing the FACT that Maoist are brutal, rest of your gibberish though valid, is directed towards wrong person. And as for myself, for so much of saying, maoist should have done been more discreet and followed "the same policy of Shoot, Shovel and Shut up like RNA and police " and revising the policy, my humble opinion netaa ji is............. they CAN/WILL not do that. Nope, not becasue they are STUPID. But because, they need to instill FEAR, and are cohesive TERRORISTS who can hide many of the dead bodies of their commarades but would care less to hide their victims mercilessly abused &/ or killed. you see, terrorist by nature, has to use this tacticts to show their brutality and thus to suceed in their sick motive, as presidentofusa mentioned,"terrorism is the use of force and threats to frighten people into obeying completely". What better way to do this other than let people SEE how inhuman, heartless these Son of a B****S they are. Period. If you would ask me, both RNA and maoist are guilty, but the point here, if i am not mistaken is WHOZ more responsible and are they equally to be blamed. Now, lets ask ourselves, if some mad men starts to fire indiscriminately and are killing people, could the other group trying to shoot down those mad men to protect the people (although some better killed aka those useless politicians and corrupt leaders) in general, but also hurts the people, EQUALLY responsible? Logically, i presume the answer should be NO. Rest, to each to their own. Indisguise:)