Posted by: isolated freak January 24, 2005
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
even their philosophy (which one might call it a similarity) is different as jamin and patal..
No , confused. The Khmer Rogue was following Mao-ism in its pure, unrefined form. All the Third World revolutionaries have embraced Maoism as their chief ideology because of Mao's insistence on Guerrilla warfare and rural organization. I don't know much about the Nepali Maoist's future plans or their ideal state, but if they insist on having a Maoist state in its pure, unrefined form, then it won't be different from any Red to the core states.
Robert Kaplan's The Ends of the Earth: From Togo to Turkmenistan, From Iran to Cambodia, a Journey to the Frontiers of Anarchy, is worth reading if you want to get some idea on Cambodia and it's revolution.