I agree with Mr. Pandey most of the time as I read the article. I have to say I'm no lawyer or a lawmaker. We should take risks, 100 % agreed. We should have efficient laws and regulations. But I don't think our laws are as much of a problem as their implementations. Enough laws are there by now and some will be coming soon. And I do not think our laws should change upon a click of the mouse, if that is what he meant. That will create more confusions in "a couple of days". One thing we are lacking is a very clever, but honest at heart, political technocrat who can rally the mass both in talk and deed, should be non-prejudicial to any castes whatsoever. Nation development is not a rocket science, agreed again; Rocket science should be a child of the national development. However, without science nothing will happen. Common sense is vital all the time during the process, but , depending upon the definition of "common sense", it is not enough. It is more of a natural process with science and technology as the main engines of the car, the economy/financial activities as its wheels and "HE" as the driver. Education is the starter, social welfare is the passengers, or load. "He" does require a thorough political background and huge knowledge of mathematics and preferably with some science and economic background. Yes, he should be a hero, "a master of all and jack of none". We should be able to do it like the Europeans, only in a better systematic way ( I know you might be giggling). This kind of "high thinking, simple living" ethics, at least to start with, should be the prime kernel to support all our undertakings. I believe we are uneducated right now, but highly educatable, so to say. Astu!