San Bro,
This is the first time I have to disagree with you. I've read many posts by you which were more touching and motivational, but not this one.

I agree on few points though, unless proven guilty no one should judge Dil Shova for any of the accusations. And on the mean time, no one should rally against the news outlet or the reporter for reporting a news, that government is investigating based on a complaint and evidence. Yeah, the ones which just got the snippets and portrayed incomplete news are the ones to blame.

First and foremost, the waiver to follow rules, because it not the US but Nepal, is very dangerous. No one should encourage, specially in public forum to disregard laws of any land. And Dil Shova should have taken care of those as she is now a 'celebrity social worker', with many recognition, awards and public appearances, has role model for many youths. If she doesn't portray a clean social work, many will use that as excuse in future. As important it is to do good deed, good foundation is equally necessary. If this incident is let go, then there would not be a basis to investigate anyone in future. If any other NGO had done the same thing, will you be saying the same?

I completely understand how life is Nepal or other under developed country. Dil Shova has a great heart and used her own property and money before she got any assistance. She still lives the same way as others in her care do. She is humble and simple.

But does is do any good to the ones in her shelter if the needed care is not provided. Those kids could have been homeless and without food. Agreed. But being together like this and no proper care, no proper sanitation just makes it worse. both kids and elderly are very susceptible to disease. When one gets sick, it will sicken all. A kid may have died (sorry for bad choice of word) quietly somewhere, now 2 dozens may suffer. If kids were treated this way in other NGO, would you be writing the same?

Many family may not have choice or means to have good sanitation. But its within their family. I can chose how I want to love. But when one says, I'll take care of, and not only you many more, and for that I am will use public's money, it is no longer personal. That's why there are regulations. Yeah, may not have been enforced and many other cases go unnoticed. Does that mean all cases should be ignored. Even when a written complaint with evidence (most sound valid) has been filed? Would you be thinking the same way in some other INGO did the same?

If we agree with you, none of the improper management of any hospital, elderly places, children homes can ever be prosecuted. Because whatever they are doing, they are making lives of some at least better than what id would have been. That would give freedom to do anything, if are doing at least something good.

If we agree with you, it would be ok for someone to give shelter to 20 kids and make 5 of them work in his restaurant, 16 hr a day. He will still be okay because he gave 'better' life to them than what they would have gotten other wise.

If we agree with you, all child domestic helpers will be okay. They got something to eat and floor to sleep with roof above. Are you saying we should encouraging more kids from poor families be allowed to work for the rich in their homes, because they will get food to eat, tv to watch, water to bathe (may be warm water)? I doubt it.

I see you mean well, but cannot agree with your logic or the words.
May be I am way too wrong, but I felt compelled to respond.