JPEG,

I do not think you are understanding  the point what I said. It seems like this is your first research  and  writing a paper on history??? and came across this thing which has enlightened you and got fascinated. Otherwise you would have understood the very meaning of "discourse" in scholarly world.

What I was trying to say is the "whole aryan invasion theory" is a discourse.and in this regard there are/will be many articles researches written for and against  this theory. It is upto you  to choose . I posted the articles written against the aryan invasion theory because

1. Intially when I posted my comments, people inclduing you  might have felt I am writting just on top of my head without any base, which is not true.

2. Second you should also know that there are many counter theories , and mostly that are presented by eastern scholars.

3. People visiting this thread should also know that this whole thing of aryan invasion is big discourse Again, this whole idea of "Aryan Invasion" initiated/imposed by the western scholars for the first place and there are many underlying resaons for them to do so. And as for me, along with many eastern scholars, I  also DO NOT BELIEVE that once so rich and sophisticated civilization got vanished just because of unskilled- nomadic invasion.THAT IS MY POINT

-THE END- FROM MY SIDE