Lutekukur, I agree with you that Maoists were the first ones to voice "republic" agenda. Maoists also were the ones to voice against monarchy that does not mean "what ever" they do is correct or could be the leaders of Nepal. Here is why. 1- Maoism/communism is a dying breed (yeah we have heard that enough!) but why did they flourish in Nepal? Was it the atrocities of Paras or Deependra? Was it the multi-party government that fuel led and strengthened the Maoists or were there any other political force that (outside the country) is responsible for the mayhem in Nepal? Something to think about. 2- Maoists are non-democratic, ruthless and lack the vision to govern the country. Nepali Maobadi and they know very well that in the current world events a communist government (like the one in China) will not be acceptable to the world super powers including India. 3- Sita Ram Yachuri's involvement in peace brokerage and his statement even before the peace agreement came that came from his office which stated that Baburam had called his office and asked what type of communist government he wanted in Nepal and asked for directions to accomplish that goal. You still think that Maobadis are visionary and they are acting on their own vision? Think again! Having said that we cannot deny that they do exist in Nepal and are in full force. How can we make the best of this situation? I wish I had the answer. Maobadis are set in their ways. They are used to extortion, killing and looting. Will they stop their criminal activities? Let's hope so and expect them to embrace the political main stream and emerge as a legitimate public voice who are tolerant and respectful of different opinions; however that is yet to be seen! When they start respecting different opinions (socio-political beliefs) then only I will applaud them other wise I only have two thumbs down for them!! Let Peace Prevail!!! -Shiv