The entire premise of this back and forth who is right who is wrong argument doesnot make any sense here. The actual news broke on November 3rd on Reuters. The headline precisely said "U.S. State Dept says certain immigrants no longer need protected status: Washington Post".

https://in.reuters.com/article/usa-immigration-protections/u-s-state-dept-says-certain-immigrants-no-longer-need-protected-status-washington-post-idINKBN1D403A

On November 5th Himalayan time published an article titled " US State Dept says immigrants from nine countries including Nepal no longer need protected status"

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/us-state-dept-says-immigrants-nine-countries-including-nepal-no-longer-need-protected-status/

On the same article of Himalayan times it states Central America and Haiti, so something happened during news recycle and during intrepretation of that news.

With all that said, nothing is certain, it might get extended as with the case with South Sudan.
I hope it does. And please let us not bicker over who is right and wrong, please read between the lines.
Cheers my friends.