@Hereiam - Yes. I think but only if your property has earned you income in that fiscal year, right? Just having an illiquid property should only mean property tax, which the jurisdiction would have already charged you. An Accountant can chime in.

This is a good thread. Although I support full rights to dual citizenship because many of us want to retire back in Nepal (probably) but socially and culturally many new legislators may lean towards the right wing idea of why we, NRN, should reap any benefits. I don't know, I am just saying, that might be one school of thought, ten years from now.

To the OP and others, how about this, would this work? You apply and obtain the US Passport but you do have an old Nepali Citizenship Certificate with you. Ten years from now when you want to sell your my Land and House, you use the Nepali Citizenship. Although, you flew to Nepal with a US Passport but when dealing with Malpot Office while selling the land, you use Nepali Citizenship certificate.

Probably it's a bad idea, right? Because if somebody knows and sues, then you are in a mess, right? Just asking what others says about that.