You're perpetuating the problem I was alluding to.Cherry picking studies that support your hypothesis is easy in the age of internet. But even in your case, I assume, you forgot to read this:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=study-linking-genetically-modified-corn-to-cancer

That is not to say there aren't other studies that might support such claim on the dangers of GMOs.I understand it is increasingly difficult to get the right information on the internet, but most peer-reviewed scientific data currently do not support the hypothesis that GMOs are dangerous to consume.

This is not in support or against the GMOs, but I find it being unfairly used as a proxy to attack the research technologies. GMOs are being used by big corporations like Monsanto to bump up sales, but it is also being used by philanthropists, researchers, and scientists to better yield, increase nutritional values of crops, and provide food security, particularly in developing nation like ours.

In the end, one is free to come to their own conclusions, but I for one, like to look at the evidence.