Posted by: NALAPANI May 1, 2013
Is Nepal better off as an indian territory?
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
 Freedom, I was just clearing some of the misunderstanding you have about Sikkim since you were trying to show Sikkim like switzerland. To add more, Sikkim does not have industries (except Rangpo based Sikkim Distillery). Majority of population is still dependent on traditional agriculture. So, how can you claim Sikkim is way better than Nepal? Yes, you are right Law and order is good. We were also not bad few years ago and I don't think this lawlessness will last forever. 

OK, I admit India is a great nation, probably super power of future. But still I do not see merging to India as a workable solution. We do not need to annex to india to be next Sikkim. No huge difference between Sikkim and Nepal as per my observation. Even if I agree with you as Sikkim is a great great place, I see more chance of Nepal being next Kashmir after annexation to union of india, not Sikkim. This is not hypothesis my friend, it's reality. Do you think  level of consciousness of Nepalese people is same as Sikkimese back in 70's? 

Have a good day!
Last edited: 01-May-13 10:20 AM
Last edited: 01-May-13 10:28 AM
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article