Posted by: Daaku June 20, 2012
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
@Dharke,i am taking my word back and replying .
I am here to learn/debate/question.I am not going to be force fed opinions/hearsay for fact, so naturally i question/doubt/protest/point fingers.
If it was not for your last article,i would have still called you a propagandist.Contrary to your claim, most of your articles were fear mongering.For someone who claims to have an open mind,you did not post anything from the "other" perspective(I agree that i didn't read every single post of yours after some time )..
I don't claim of being a very learned person but i do have a brain of my own.I can see/analyze my surroundings.
My discussion with Nalapani is totally different.I agree i did divert the thread,sorry about that.His take on Nepali history is from the eyes of the ruler.Does questioning him make me a dick?
Thank you for dedicating all those paragraphs to make me look inferior.I am open for ideas and debate.
@everybody else
My take on two most important issues regarding federalism
1)Naming of the state:If the majority of the population find naming the state on ethnic lines offensive than what is in a name?Name it anything.But when it comes to craving a state,it should be done in such a way that the "mulbasi' of the land make atleast 30% of the state population.
2)Reservation/Quota: This is a double edged sword.While it can do wonders to the marginalised community,it would also do injustice to the ones who do not fall into that category.I hope we can find a solution to this.Personally,i would care less about this.
I am here to learn/debate/question.I am not going to be force fed opinions/hearsay for fact, so naturally i question/doubt/protest/point fingers.
If it was not for your last article,i would have still called you a propagandist.Contrary to your claim, most of your articles were fear mongering.For someone who claims to have an open mind,you did not post anything from the "other" perspective(I agree that i didn't read every single post of yours after some time )..
I don't claim of being a very learned person but i do have a brain of my own.I can see/analyze my surroundings.
My discussion with Nalapani is totally different.I agree i did divert the thread,sorry about that.His take on Nepali history is from the eyes of the ruler.Does questioning him make me a dick?
Thank you for dedicating all those paragraphs to make me look inferior.I am open for ideas and debate.
@everybody else
My take on two most important issues regarding federalism
1)Naming of the state:If the majority of the population find naming the state on ethnic lines offensive than what is in a name?Name it anything.But when it comes to craving a state,it should be done in such a way that the "mulbasi' of the land make atleast 30% of the state population.
2)Reservation/Quota: This is a double edged sword.While it can do wonders to the marginalised community,it would also do injustice to the ones who do not fall into that category.I hope we can find a solution to this.Personally,i would care less about this.