Posted by: Maverick October 18, 2011
Login in to Rate this Post:
1 
? 
Liked by
?
Liked by
Scenario 4:
One person Z says maa sherawali of Mithun is a good movie. Then as soon as that, the other person says,'r u kidding me? You must be a great fan of Mithun'. The other person deserved to be banned.
As far as I know, any one should be entitled to the opinion whether its social courtesy or not. According to you, I should start speaking according to what peoples' likes or dislikes? If one thinks he is the god than let him think that he is the god. What's wrong with that? After all we are just dealing with the alter ego anyway.
I'll reiterate the words, which I have told you many times over years. A thread initiator should be entitled to ban or delete users from that thread. We don't require a global police. How would you define a thoughtful discussion or an aspersion?
People can't stop their own goddamn ego to stop reacting to already knee jerk reaction and cry back to you when they cannot totally pulverize the starter.
my two cents,
-Mav
One person Z says maa sherawali of Mithun is a good movie. Then as soon as that, the other person says,'r u kidding me? You must be a great fan of Mithun'. The other person deserved to be banned.
As far as I know, any one should be entitled to the opinion whether its social courtesy or not. According to you, I should start speaking according to what peoples' likes or dislikes? If one thinks he is the god than let him think that he is the god. What's wrong with that? After all we are just dealing with the alter ego anyway.
I'll reiterate the words, which I have told you many times over years. A thread initiator should be entitled to ban or delete users from that thread. We don't require a global police. How would you define a thoughtful discussion or an aspersion?
People can't stop their own goddamn ego to stop reacting to already knee jerk reaction and cry back to you when they cannot totally pulverize the starter.
my two cents,
-Mav