Posted by: Shantipriya October 10, 2011
Login in to Rate this Post:
2 
? 
Liked by
?
Liked by
timer, i feel like laughing at you. brother, what do you mean by democracy? you mean to say we are more democratic than panchayet if so how..count how many journo were killed in panchayt vs your democracy? count the numbers pls..it is the same panchayat which locked bharat gurung, d b lama and who unlocked them?- your democracy..who is jp gupta? who is gachhedar? and if you are so clean how come they are the next so powerful people in your cabinet? do you even know there is a case against jp gupta in supreme court..etc i can go on an on...again, ramhari shrestha, birendra shah were killed? was that the demand of the time ? mr gt bro as you put your words on other thread? where is the culprit ?? he is the member of CA and you call it what?-beauty of democracy??? where criminal can enjoy and dance over the chest of the people ??
how old were you during 2046- if you are less than 10 years, then you better ask your parents about law and order, sense of security.. yes there were bad thing happened at that time, but also good happened too, yes no one liked panchayat as the system, but again, this is the only system which lasted 30 years and gave stability after 2007. it is during the same period, nepal got UN recognition when Sikkim was annexed...if you like to make real comparison come up with facts not your hypothesis. the point is if we say panchayet is so bad, we have to be in a stage where we should be soooooooo good..are we or are we not?? objective analysis is needed here.
and if you do not want to argue on the points and people's name, then you should not have posted their name without knowing the fact. just because they were under the king does not make them corrupt or puppet, do not forget anuradha koirala and upendra devkota were also minister in king gyanendra's ministry, do you think these people are also corrupt?? or you did not voted for anuradha koirala?? just giving example, again does not mean today we are far better than king gyanendra's period, rather we are worst off!!!
again, it is not the matter of ideology- it is matter of right vs wrong, crime/criminal/impunity vs justice, so called democracy vs real democracy...yes napunsak are those who can not differentiate who is criminal or who is not!!!
how old were you during 2046- if you are less than 10 years, then you better ask your parents about law and order, sense of security.. yes there were bad thing happened at that time, but also good happened too, yes no one liked panchayat as the system, but again, this is the only system which lasted 30 years and gave stability after 2007. it is during the same period, nepal got UN recognition when Sikkim was annexed...if you like to make real comparison come up with facts not your hypothesis. the point is if we say panchayet is so bad, we have to be in a stage where we should be soooooooo good..are we or are we not?? objective analysis is needed here.
and if you do not want to argue on the points and people's name, then you should not have posted their name without knowing the fact. just because they were under the king does not make them corrupt or puppet, do not forget anuradha koirala and upendra devkota were also minister in king gyanendra's ministry, do you think these people are also corrupt?? or you did not voted for anuradha koirala?? just giving example, again does not mean today we are far better than king gyanendra's period, rather we are worst off!!!
again, it is not the matter of ideology- it is matter of right vs wrong, crime/criminal/impunity vs justice, so called democracy vs real democracy...yes napunsak are those who can not differentiate who is criminal or who is not!!!
Last edited: 10-Oct-11 05:43 PM