I agree with those saying this is a matter of choice when and where a choice can be made. In cases where the patient is not in a position to make a choice, I feel there needs to be some threshold defined by the law - ie consent of living parents, children, and spouse etc. I would caution people against allowing the Chiavo case to influence too much their opinions about euthanasia. As per what I have read, most euthanasia cases in the US involve the consensus of loved ones and the Chiavo case was more the exception to the rule. This is a tough subject that exposes some sensitive spots in people's value and belief systems and I respect the views of those who think differently. I don't think there are too many easy answers to all the questions this issue brings up. To life (while it lasts) :)