Benedict, what you are saying is Nepal ka murti haru sabai Europe and USA ma chan. Nepal tries to claim that those murti was stolen from Nepal so return to Nepal. On what basis should Nepal claim that its their? Its been sold at least 10 hands before its in the current owner hand. Now, the current owner says I bought this murti 50 years back and now that person who he bought from is dead. I didn't know how the previous owner bought this murti. The cost of murti now is 200 million. I cannot return it even though I know it may have been stolen. Is this correct logic???