Posted by: khaikhok June 23, 2022
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Who twisted the meaning of Hinduism? Who are "they"?
Who said Charbak was lynched ? Charbak is a philosophy not an individual..and actual author of this book/samhita is unknown. With anti-Hindu concept in mind it will be easier to believe
"oh charbak said bad about God and orthodox Brahman burnt him alive"
We Hindus are narcissistic?
How do you know I don't have open mind ?
I don't want to make any arguments coz you might think I don't have any. But assuming things won't do any good. History of Hinduism is very mysterious. And don't go after Manu. He was just a human being. He wrote what he thought was dharma. Thousands of rishis during his own time contradicted with him. We in modern age established Manusmriti as guide book. But there are millions of such smritis. And good thing abt Hinduism is you can believe whatever you want. But regardless, I'm more interested in philosophy like upanishads and Gita than karma Kandi skriptures.
Who said Charbak was lynched ? Charbak is a philosophy not an individual..and actual author of this book/samhita is unknown. With anti-Hindu concept in mind it will be easier to believe
"oh charbak said bad about God and orthodox Brahman burnt him alive"
We Hindus are narcissistic?
How do you know I don't have open mind ?
I don't want to make any arguments coz you might think I don't have any. But assuming things won't do any good. History of Hinduism is very mysterious. And don't go after Manu. He was just a human being. He wrote what he thought was dharma. Thousands of rishis during his own time contradicted with him. We in modern age established Manusmriti as guide book. But there are millions of such smritis. And good thing abt Hinduism is you can believe whatever you want. But regardless, I'm more interested in philosophy like upanishads and Gita than karma Kandi skriptures.