? 
Not here to argue with pandemic too much but I seriously question his ability to do research, as his findings are explicitly from sources that either has no credibility, or is extremely biased. Following are some findings about the sources that pandemic uses for his research.
# Citation of inappropriate sources
The Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) is a magazine for professional journalists that has been published by the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism since 1961. CJR has compiled a list of websites that are identified as fake-news, clickbait, and hate sites.
Fake news list:
Below are some of the sites that are identified by CJR as conspiracy, clickbait, bias and hate sites. Interestingly our friend “pandemic” seems to be utilizing these questionable sources to conduct his “RESEARCH”.
off-guardian.org
humansarefree.com
theblaze.com
# False claim regarding SM-102
Pandemic posted an article which falsely targeted Moderna vaccine ingredient SM-102 as unsafe. This claim has been fact-checked by AP news. Refer to the link below to read about SM-102
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-339133801807
# Posting videos of Journalist with the history of covering conspiracy theories.
Ben Swann.
“Swann created a news segment called Reality Check in association with Fox 19 in Cincinnati and CBS46 in Atlanta, in which he covered "issues other media is not looking at" and uncritically presented alt-right conspiracy theories. Swann reported on conspiracy theories about the 2012 Aurora, Colorado shooting, questioned the truth of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, presented 9/11 conspiracy theories, and the false claims of a cover-up by the CDC of data related to the MMR vaccine and autism.”