[Show all top banners]

rupas
Replies to this thread:

More by rupas
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 Are Nepalese victim of Grand Conspiracy?
[VIEWED 6806 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 10-12-12 2:13 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 




1) Why did India shelter and provided arms to Nepali Maoists?
2) Why did India not help capture Nepali Maoists even though they were listed as terrorist group by United States?
3) India has its own Maoist problem, but why is it supporting Maoists in Nepal?
4) King Birendra and his family's assassination? Was it a co-incidence?
5) Why did India block the deal between US and Nepal to supply army helicopters to assist Nepal government in fighting against Maoists?
6) Why did India stop supplying arms to Nepal Army but at the same time it supplied arms to Nepal Maoists?

I'll appreciate if everyone can keep their tone down and take this as an intellectual discussion. Please post your views and if any reference material you have regarding this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2DDIuyCMrm0&list=UUfpXqxcGn41bUUNzVhHDiEw
Last edited: 12-Oct-12 05:07 PM

 
Posted on 10-13-12 8:45 AM     [Snapshot: 275]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Are there not enough intellectual Nepalese who would want to brainstorm on topics like these?

 
Posted on 10-13-12 11:02 AM     [Snapshot: 378]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     1       ?     Liked by
 

 You're too smart for average Nepalese. 
 
Posted on 10-13-12 10:08 PM     [Snapshot: 621]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Thanks for the sarcastic comment, Riddle.

 
Posted on 10-14-12 2:07 AM     [Snapshot: 703]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

This is my take on this whole thing.

1) Maoist movement was on the cards since the 80's, but didn't solidify due to strict outlawing of political parties.

2) With the advent of multiparty democracy, political organization becomes easier and seeds for the war are sown. Prachanda picks Rolpa and Rukum since the people there are easier to fool, but martial. Plus Kathmandu doesn't care about the far-west.

3) The experimental war kicks off and spreads faster than expected. Maoists know that the deep respect for Birendra and Dipendra among the people means that they'll never support an overthrow of the Monarchy. Birendra needs to be eliminated.
4) The Maoists join forces with Gyanendra and wipe off Birendra's lineage. The Maoists dangle a carrot that would make Gyanendra King and with his help Maoists would come to power and outlaw all the other parties in Nepal and hence rule until eternity. Only the top Maoists and Gyanendra are in on this agreement, hence the fighting goes on even after Gyanendra is King. There are numerous ceasefires announced however.

5) In true Macchalevian fashion, now the Maoists also begin negotiating with the political parties. As the Maoists become more and more vicious, public support for them falls, hence they need to forge alliances with both the King and the parties. In the end they will side with whoever helps them get into power.

5) India doesn't arrest their leaders because their leadership is a possible ally of the palace as well as Girija and Co.

6) In the end the side with the parties because people want the war to end and see Gyanendra as the obstacle.



5)
 
Posted on 10-14-12 2:35 AM     [Snapshot: 714]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Additional Comments

1) Just because the US labels Maoists as terrorists doesn't mean that India is forced to arrest them. Nepal and India haven't signed an extradition treaty so India wasn't forced to arrest them. Plus like I said, political forces in Nepal didn't want them arrested, imo.

2) India didn't sell any weapons to Maoists from the state level, the Maoists guns were for the most part, rudimentary and were bought in the Indian black market and or captured from the Nepal Police/Army.
 
Posted on 10-14-12 9:00 AM     [Snapshot: 804]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Hakim Saab,

1) Indian government had arrested some of the Maoists whereas most of the Maoists were never arrested. Do you remember Baidya, Goits arrests? Do you remember the public meeting that Madhav Nepal had held with Prachanda and Baburam Bhattarai in Lucknow? Lucknow meeting was a matter of public knowledge.

2) The conspiracy theory that you mention that King Gyanendra was somehow linked with Maoists has been proven wrong. There were several websites until 2003 that claimed that it was Royal Maoism. You can check archives.org.

3) While some of the arms may have been bought in Indian black market, is it really convincing argument that all of the arms could have been bought in this black market? Where did this money come from? Even if you add all the robbing incidents by Maoists in Nepal, it would not suffice to buy the arms, let alone the expense of accomodation for several years.

4) How were the Maoists easily able to cross the border with arms?

5) Although India was in no way obligated to arrest and extradite Maoists to Nepal, was it also okay to shelter them even though they were listed as terrorists by United States?  Isn't that helping a terrorist group? Doesn't that make India a state sponsorship of terrorism?


 
Posted on 10-14-12 12:43 PM     [Snapshot: 886]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Don't you all know the money for maoist come from United Nations

 
Posted on 10-14-12 1:43 PM     [Snapshot: 935]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

अहिले सम्म पनि बिरेन्द्र को  बंश ज्ञानेन्द्र ले नास गरेको हो भनेर सोच्ने मान्छे हरु लै म महा मुर्ख को गोर्खा दक्षिण बाहु प्रदान गर्न चाहन्छु. बिरेन्द्र को हत्या ज्ञानेन्द्र ले नभई बिदेशी शक्ति हरु को सड्यन्त्र  थियो.
 
अब किन भनेर सोध्नु होला, ल सुन्नुस:
 
नेपाल को हरेक आन्तरिक मामला मा भारत को  हस्ताच्याप देखेर बिरेन्द्र एकदमै निराश थिए. २०४६ साल मा पनि , नेपाल ले चीन संगै हतियार किनेको रिस ले गर्दा , भारत ले  नेपाल को  राजनीतिक पार्टी हरु संग मिलेर राजतन्त्र लै चुनौती दिदै पंचायत व्यवस्था मिल्काएका थिए. 
 
जब देखि भारत स्वतन्त्र भयो तब देखि नै  उसले नेपाल, सिक्किम, कश्मिर लै  आफुमा गाभ्ने योजना बनाएको थियो. सिक्किमलाइ सजिलै गाभ्यो, कश्मिरलै जबर्जस्ति आफ्नो भन्छ तर अहिले सम्म पनि काश्मिरका
छोरा हरु तेस्को बिरुद्ध लड्दै छन्. 
 
धेरै अगाडी नै भारत ले  सोचिसकेको थियो कि जबसम्म नेपाल मा  जनता ले माया गर्ने राजतन्त्र रहन्छ तबसम्म नेपाललै आफु मा  गाभ्ने कुरा त परे जाओस, आफुले भनेजस्तो गराऊन पनि गार्है पर्थ्यो.  त्येस्मथी उनीहरु बिरेन्द्र   अन्तरास्ट्रिय जगत मा चिन्निदै गएको र त्येसले गर्दा नेपाल माथि हैकम चलाउन गार्हो हुन थालेको महसुस गरिसकेका थिए . अहिले को जमानामा  आफुमा गाभ्न नसके पनि नेपाल लै आफ्नो उप निवेश सरह  राख्ने उदेश्य बनाए भारतीय हरु ले.
 
बिरेन्द्र  भारत ले  नेपालको माओबादी लै श्रीलंका को LTTE जस्तै गरि जन्माएको कुरा ले पनि भारत संग रुस्ट थिए. नेपाली माओबादी लै हतियार र पैसा को सहयोग मात्रै होइन training पनि दिने गर्थे भारतीय हरु. यो कुरा ले चिन्तित थिए बिरेन्द्र.
 
२०५७ साल ताका चीन को भ्रमण मा  रहदा नेपाल को मुस्तांग को  सिमाना बाट चीन मा रहेको सिल्क route सम्म नेपाली  कार्गो हेरु le travel  पास पौने सम्झौता भएको थियो.सिल्क route को एक्सेस ले गर्दा नेपाल ले  सिद्धी european देश हरु संग व्यापार गर्न पौने अवस्था सिर्जना हुदै थियो. ऊनी  बिस्तारै भारत संग को  निर्भरता लै घताऊदै देश लै भारत को influence बाट  निकाल्न चाहन्थे. जून कुरा  भारत संग गोप्य राखिएको थियो तर भारतको  खुफिया agency  RAW    
 ले थाहा पायो. तेस्पची ऊनी हरु रिस ले आगो भए र नेपालको  राजतन्त्र लै सदा को लागि सिद्ध्याउने योजना बनाउन थाले. 
 
योजना :
बिरेन्द्र को  परिवार लै नै सिद्ध्यौनी र उसको भाइ ज्ञानेन्द्र को सन्तान लै मात्र बाकि राख्ने जसले गर्दा. आम मानिस लै लागोस कि सत्ता को लागि  ज्ञानेन्द्र ले बिरेन्द्र को परिवार लै सिद्ध्याए अनि. उनि हरु ले सोचेका थिए तेती नै बेला जनता रीस को झोक मा ज्ञानेन्द्र लै राजा बन्न दिदैनन होला भनेर. त्येसको निम्ति उनीहरुले देश सोक्मगना भएको बेलामा उनीहरु को   संचार मध्यम हरु मा ज्ञानेन्द्र को बिरोध भएको जोड तोड ले  देखाउदै थिए, जनता लै उचाल्न. तर राजसस्था  लै माया गर्ने नेपाली  सबै सोक मग्न भएको बेलामा तेस्तो कदम उठाउन सकेनन. 
 
उनीहरु ले  सोचे जस्तो नभए पनि  उनीहरु ले सोचे जस्तै मानिस हरु ज्ञानेन्द्र लै संका को दृस्टी ले हेर्न थाले. अब चै नेपाल बाट  राजा  फाल्न  सकिन्छ भन्ने आस पलौना थाल्यो उनीहरु लै. अब ऊनीहरु  माओबादी  युद्ध चर्कौना थाले. देशमा सान्ति सुरक्ष्य को धज्जिया उदौना थाले. दिन दहाडै मानिस हरु को  घटी रेटी , गोलि हानी, आदि इत्यादी ,तरिका ले
 हत्या हुन थाल्यो. देश मा आतंक फैलायो. यो देखेर भर्खर राजा बनेका ज्ञानेन्द्र मा  मैले केहि गर्नुपर्छ भन्ने भावना पलौना थाल्यो. तर उनि राज्य संचालन को कुरा मा अलि inexperienced थिए. तेस्कै फाइदा उठाउदै भरितीय हरु शेरबहादुर देउबा लै अपदस्त गरि सासन सत्ता आफु मा  लिएर नेपाललै माओबादी युद्ध बाट निकाल्ने सुझाब दिन थाले. but they were playing double game . यता अपदस्त पारिएका पार्टीहरु लै अब माओबादी संगै मिलेर राज्तान्तंत्र फालेर आफै मिलेर सासन गर भनेर ऊक्सौना थाल्यो. जसको परिणाम १२ बूंदे  समज्धारी भयो.
र  ज्ञानेन्द्र लै  villain को बिल्ला  पहरैयो. बिरेन्द्र मारेर राजा बनेको  भनेर सोचेर रुस्ट भएका  सोझा जनताहरु पनि ६२/६३ आन्दोलन मा ज्ञानेन्द्र  बिरुद्ध होमिए. सब्बै माओबादी हरु राजधानी मा  हुलिए. राजा र जनता बीच ठुलो संघर्स भएको जस्तो देखाइयो. अन्तत: गिरिजा प्रसाद  कोइराला र अरु नेता हरु संग राजा को बार्ता भए पछि उनले सासन फिर्ता  दिएका हुन्.
ज्ञानेन्द्र को गल्ति  एउटा मात्रै थ्यो माघ १९ को ,कदम जुन ऊनले राम्रै सोचेर लिएका थिए. निर्वाचन पनि गरौऊन खोजेको थिए जून विफल पारिएको थियो. 
 
 नेपाल को GEOSTRATEGIC  लोकेशन ले  गर्दा चिन लै टुक्राउन खोज्ने  बिदेशी शक्ति हरुको पनि हात छ यो खेल मा. european union जसले करिस्चियन धर्म संसार भरि फैलाउने काम लिएको छ, उ पनि येस्मा संग्लग्न छ. 
 
धेरै कुरा छन् जुन तपाइलाई थाहा नै छैन. गलत सोचाई राख्नु हुन्छ तपाई एदी ज्ञानेन्द्र ले  बिरेन्द्र लै मरेका हुन् भनेर सोच्नु हुन्छ भने.
राजतन्त्रलै नै support गर्नुपर्छ भन्ने छैन. त्यो आफ्नो आफ्नो विचार हो तर कुरै नबुजिकाना कसैमाथि झुटो  आरोप लगाएर बहिस्कार गर्नु महा मुर्खता हो.

 
Posted on 10-14-12 3:08 PM     [Snapshot: 985]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Kichkanni-Your arguments are good and logical.

mno-Yes, the money for the Maoists comes from United Nations. However, UN took this burden only after the signing of the peace agreement. We are specifically questioning the funds that was used to fund the war against army.

 
Posted on 10-14-12 3:53 PM     [Snapshot: 1004]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 



Even Manisha knew about this. Very interesting.


 
Posted on 10-14-12 4:20 PM     [Snapshot: 1010]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

4)  Dipendra massacred his family under some sort of influence, there was no political reason behind it but after the incident took place, new political reasons were born. Gyanendra became the scapegoat of all these mess. Girijia duped him. Despite Gyanendra family's urge to reveal everything clearcut, Girija led committee tried to conceal the truth and hence the wildfire against Gyanendra spread out. 

Other than that all these conspiracy is nothing but talk of the town, mere gossip when you've nothing creative to think about, it starts out. This is it. I don't have sympathy to Gyanendra, but just saying what I think.

Birendra was a great king. 

 
Posted on 10-14-12 4:34 PM     [Snapshot: 1029]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Bittertruth, thanks for your input.  We are not debating whether King Birendra was good or his brother King Gyanendra.   There are very subjective arguments about both brothers and equal likes and dislikes. While Birendra gave power to the politicians and created mess that started war in the nation, Gyanendra inherited a war and political mess that his brother had created. At the same time, it seems like Birendra gave up power easily in 1990 but Gyanendra wanted to take it back. But again, why did Gyanendra prove everyone wrong of his accusation of power hungry man by giving up power so easily? There are several scenarios one could be completely wrong in analysis. For example, King Gyanendra's sacking of the parliament.....was it a good step or a bad step? What would you have done if you were him? Was King Birendra's introduction to constitutional monarchy a good thing for Nepal or bad choice? Would he have given up power in 1990 if he could foresee the present mess?

____________

One of India's National TV channel Aaj Tak interviews Prachanda when he was listed as terrorist by United States. Could this same TV channel dare to interview Taliban leaders?

 
Posted on 10-14-12 7:53 PM     [Snapshot: 1115]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

He should have put all those woos leaders in the jail, imposed martial law, got support from his allies, and could have been a leader of public rather than king.


 
Posted on 10-14-12 9:07 PM     [Snapshot: 1160]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

 

PROCLAMATION TO THE NATION FROM HIS MAJESTY KING GYANENDRA BIR BIKRAM SHAH DEV

(February 1, 2005)

Beloved Countrymen,

1. The Kingdom of Nepal was built on the foundations of the unification process initiated by King Prithvi Narayan Shah the Great. It is well known that to reign in accordance with the people’s aspirations, our forefathers initiated revolutionary measures of historic importance, ensuring a bright future of the nation and her people. History is witness to the fact that both the Nepalese people and the King have, in unison, played decisive roles in each and every period of the Kingdom’s process of unification, democratisation and modernisation.

2. Today, we have once again reached a juncture where, in keeping with popular aspirations, a historic decision must be taken to defend multiparty democracy by restoring peace for the nation and people. Even when bloodshed, violence and devastation has pushed the country on the brink of destruction, those engaged in politics in the name of the country and people continue to shut their eyes to their welfare. Tussle for power, abuse of authority on gaining power and unhealthy competition in fulfilling personal and communal interests at the expense of the nation and citizenry contributed to the further deterioration in the situation. There were attempts to flout the universally accepted rule of law in the name of politics. Our desire to ensure social, political and economic justice for our beloved people through the meaningful exercise of multiparty democracy could not be materialised. There was a steady rise in crimes against the nation and people, including destruction of development infrastructures constructed for the people’s benefit. Whereas all democratic forces should have adopted an unified approach against terrorism, leaders instead continued their tussle for power, encouraging simple political workers to vandalise public utilities in the name of politics. Faced with this steadily declining situation, it is now time to bring to an end the ongoing acts of terrorist violence and pledge, in earnest, to fulfill the people’s aspirations with the restoration of peace and security in the country.

Beloved countrymen,

3. Democracy and progress always complement each other. But, Nepal’s bitter experiences over the past few years tend to show that democracy and progress contradict one another. Multiparty democracy was discredited by focusing solely on power politics. Parliament witnessed many aberrations in the name of retaining and ousting governments. Not a single House of Representatives was allowed to complete its tenure. Continuous confusion and disorder resulted in the obstruction of the democratic process. While the people’s aspirations continued to be shattered and their trust trampled on, they became increasingly disenchanted with democracy itself. After being incapable of holding elections, there were conspiracies to form undemocratic governments, which would be responsible to no one. There was also a written consensus amongst all political parties on vacuuming the people’s representatives out but they could not see eye to eye when it came to working together in filling this void. The participation and concurrence of political parties in making way for a form of governance, which negated popular representation, was against the people’s wishes and norms and spirit of multiparty democracy. So, we appealed to all those who have faith in democracy with the intention of activating, at the earliest, the system of popular representation. We also met a number of times with members of the general public, senior citizens, representatives of the civil society and leaders of political parties in our effort to gauze the popular mandate and try to convince them of the country’s requirements and people’s aspirations. We reminded them that the only wish of the Nepalese people and friends of Nepal was to bring to an end the ongoing violence and destructive activities and return peace and tranquility to the country without any further delay. In order to conduct the general elections in an environment of peace and security, opportunities were given to leaders of various political parties to constitute the Council of Ministers, with executive power. But the situation did not improve. National politics was plagued by not uniting in running the government but opposing it on being ousted from it. No serious efforts were made to attenuate the real threat posed against democracy by terrorism in the form of a single-party autocracy. The habit of passing carefree remarks on matters of national security continued. Political parties were unable to display responsible behavior in augmenting the patriotic fervour of our dutiful security personnel, who are active round the clock in ensuring security of the nation and people. Multiparty democrats could not sincerely unite, with national interest as the focal point, to forever end the cycle of devastation being lashed out against the nation and people. Likewise, political parties also could not identify national priorities in keeping with the people’s aspirations.

4. Throughout history, the Nepalese people never had to bear the burden of such terrorism, agony and exploitation. No democracy has ever had to go through such a dismal situation, where the innocent are punished by criminals, people whose property is seized and innocent children, women and the elderly who are mercilessly killed by criminals cannot receive any kind of protection from those who govern in their name and parties who claim to represent the people do not act in their defence. The nefarious designs of an individual or group, negating the wishes of the Nepalese people as well as the national interest and acting through sponsored mobs, cannot form our national agenda. Conscientiousness towards our responsibility to the future of the country and people has nudged us many a time. Circumstances have reached such a critical stage that it has now become imperative for us to take a decision in the greater interest of the nation and people in accordance with their aspirations.

Beloved Countrymen,

5. Nepal’s independence, national unity and sovereignty are best safeguarded by the intimate relationship between the King and people. An Institution of Monarchy ever devoted to the country and people and a people with an innate love for their land is the glorious history of the Kingdom of Nepal, its present and also its future. In keeping with this glorious tradition, popular will as always remained the guiding light for Nepal’s Monarchy. We are committed to social justice; totalitarianism and authoritarianism are entirely inconsistent with the Monarchial traditions of the Shah Dynasty. We are convinced of the fact that the Nepalese people have deep faith in and are firmly committed to Constitutional Monarchy and multiparty democracy. We believe that centralisation of authority is against democratic norms. We feel that a meaningful exercise in democracy can take place only when elected representatives at all levels are given their share in the governance of the country in accordance with the principles of separation of powers. It is our desire that, while no Nepalese should experience pain or suffering, every citizen should have unfettered access to social, economic and political justice. We strongly believe that the people should always feel that their wishes are being fully honoured and their interests completely protected in the governance of the country. It is our desire to ensure that the Kingdom of Nepal forges ahead towards the creation of a mature democracy and welfare society with the collective judgment, understanding and farsightedness of all patriotic democrats. We are confident that there can never be any differences among democrats on achieving the fundamental objectives of national welfare.

6. We have no interest other than the restoration of sustainable peace and exercise in meaningful democracy for the welfare of Nepal and Nepalese people. Monarchy is guided not by a cheap popularity but by the overall welfare and continued progress of Nepal and her people. Everyone should respect the people’s desire for effective reforms. Let no Nepalese feel compelled to take up arms as a means of expressing frustration or disenchantment. At the same time, it must be ensured that every citizen has the opportunity to express discontent effectively without jeopardizing social harmony. It is clear that what the people want are a meaningful exercise in democracy, an effective market economy, good governance, transparency and a corruption-free rule of law. Our only wish is to guarantee our people’s happiness through democracy, instill hope among the youth for a brighter future and to ensure dignity for Nepal amongst the comity of nations. Equal opportunities for the development of all our languages, peoples and their cultures alone can preserve and consolidate the Kingdom’s distinct characteristics.

7. Contrary to the wishes of the Nepalese people, on whom sovereignty is vested, no serious efforts were made towards initiating elections to the House of Representatives within the year 2061 B.S. by maintaining, to the extent possible, peace and security. Instead of preparing the electorate and political parties for the elections and laying the necessary legal, managerial and technical groundwork, time was wasted on paying only lip service on the urgency of holding elections. As it is our responsibility to preserve our nationalism, national unity and sovereignty, as well as to maintain peace and security in the country and ensure that the state of the nation does not deteriorate any further, we have, by virtue of the State Authority as exercised by us and in keeping with the spirit of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal – 1990, taking into consideration Article 27 (3) of the Constitution, dissolved, effective from today, the current Council of Ministers to fulfill the people’s desire for the restoration of peace and security and to activate soon the democratic dispensation. The Council of Ministers to be constituted will be under our Chairmanship. This Council of Ministers will give utmost priority to reactivating multiparty democracy in the country within three years with the implementation of effective reforms by restoring peace and security.

Beloved countrymen,

8. Only a meaningful multiparty democracy can be an effective means of governance by the people. A successful multiparty democracy alone is synonymous with people’s democracy. Such a system, which is people-oriented, mature, cultured and refined, has been disrupted. Terrorising the innocent population, extorting money through intimidation, brutally murdering those who dissent, kidnapping students and perpetrating atrocities against teachers, making false promises to simple people and destroying development projects aimed at the people’s welfare are crimes against the nation and people, which have to be brought to an immediate end. From now on, such crimes will be dealt with firmly in accordance with the law. Our security forces have been mobilised to carry out their responsibilities more effectively to end terrorism and restore peace and security in the interest of the nation and people. All the organs of the state must remain alert in honouring and upholding human rights. However, it will be unfair to put the state and terrorists on equal footing. We are confident that all peace-loving Nepalese who have faith in democracy will, as always, continue to cooperate with the security forces in maintaining peace and tranquility.

9. We call upon all those who have gone astray, taking up arms against the nation and people, and those who are engaged in criminal activities against peace and democracy to return to the mainstream of national politics peacefully. Ensuring opportunities to freely express one’s views with patriotism as the focal point, fulfilling one’s aspirations and contributing to the welfare of the nation and people are the inherent features of multiparty democracy. We assure all those who avail of this opportunity to join the national mainstream that the state will give them opportunities and rights equal to those enjoyed by all our citizens, without any discrimination whatsoever; neither the people nor the law will tolerate any terrorist activities against the state or its citizens.

Beloved countrymen,

10. We would like to thank all the friendly nations who have generously supported us, appreciating our commitment to fight terrorism, as well as donors and international financial institutions that have rendered invaluable assistance in our development endeavours. Even the world’s democracies are presently faced with the threat of terrorism, which cannot be confined within geographical boundaries. The world community has in fact realised that the more secure, stable and prosperous the smaller nations become, the more secure, stable and prosperous will the region and the world as a whole be. Nepal is, therefore, committed to eliminating terrorism in her own interest as well as in the interest of democracies around the world. Nepal aspires for peace - for herself, her neighbours and South Asia - and to rid the world of the threat to peace.

11. While expressing our unflinching faith in multiparty democracy, we would like to mention that economic and institutional reforms will continue. Efforts at reforms in the utilisation of public expenditure and public service delivery will be made more effective. Banking discipline will be restored. Measures will be adopted towards the effective implementation of the poverty reduction strategy and the anti-corruption drive. Sustainable development is now our national agenda. No one will be allowed to jeopadise the people’s security and the future of democracy. Nepal will not allow terrorists to use her territory against herself or against any other friendly nation. In our ties with other countries, emphasis will be laid on fostering constructive relations based on mutual benefit and pragmatism.

12. Corruption, which has been continuously spreading its tentacles, has not only cast a shadow over politics and administration, but has also obstructed the nation’s march towards progress. Corruption has struck at the very core of our society, the result of which the common man’s confidence in the laws of the land has been shaken. Therefore, in keeping with the popular will and to fulfill the main criterion of good governance, effective measures will be adopted to curb corruption, while ensuring that the principles of justice are not infringed upon.

13. It is our desire that democracy be a way of life, politics be conducted in keeping with democratic norms and values, people from all strata of society honestly adhere to democratic ideals and everyone be guided by the interest of the country and people. All Nepalese wish to see our country as a progressive nation, occupying a pride of place in the international community, where democratic ideals thrive in a peaceful environment. It is our belief that upholding human rights not only preserves and promotes democratic values but also enhances a way of life and civilisational values commensurate with the 21st century.

Beloved countrymen,

14. Our decision should leave no room for confusion amongst the security personnel and civil servants in discharge of their duties and responsibilities. Today, it is we Nepalese who must take an initiative to ensure a bright future for Nepal and the Nepalese. An independent press serves as the medium for raising the level of democratic consciousness. It plays a crucial role in the promotion of national interests. We believe that the press will make effective contributions in ensuring that democratic norms and values inspire our way of life as well as governance. We are confident that, with this in mind, all those who have faith in multiparty democracy will discharge their duties from their respective places and the people’s aspirations along with the country’s requirements will be realised through the shared efforts of all the countrymen.

15. Today, the nation has made a firm commitment and a decision has also been taken accordingly. The nation has taken a step forward towards democracy and progress, leaving behind violence, insecurity and conflict. At a time when the country is in the grip of terrorism, all those who believe in democracy and peace must unite. Let us, therefore, be inspired by our collective wisdom and guided by our national perspective. Any nefarious attempts at disturbing peace and security and hindering efforts at making democracy meaningful will not be tolerated either by the nation or people. Yet, in pursuit of liberalism, we should never overlook an important aspect of our conduct, namely discipline. This is also the thinking of the 21st century. We wish to repeat once again that those who cannot do justice to Nepal, those who cannot believe in the sound judgment of the people and those who cannot stand in favour of peace will stand condemned by the motherland.

May Lord Pashupatinath bless us all!

Jaya Nepal!

 

- Gyanendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev


 
Posted on 10-15-12 9:21 AM     [Snapshot: 1260]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

 हो येही कुरा हामीले पैले पनि साझा मा उठाको ठेउ , मैले त्यो thread  बिर्से. 
नेपाल लाइ भारत मा मिसाउने भारत को पुरानो योजना थियो , सिक्किम जस्तै , तर राना देखि लिएर महेन्द्र हुदै बिरेन्द्र सम्म ले त्यो सफल हुन दिएनन्. 
नेपाल लाइ एउतै सुत्र मा बाध्ने राजतन्त्र मात्र थियो , तेसकारण नेपाल लाई निल्न राजतन्त्र ढाल्न पर्ने थियो , 
राजा बिरेन्द्र को हत्या को आरोप ज्ञानेन्द्र माथि थपे जनता को घृणा ले राजतन्त्र ढल्छ भन्ने कुरा मा भारत बिसोस्ता थियो जुन उनि हरु को प्लान मुताबिकै भयो , अमेरिका सरकार ले पनि तेस्मा सहयोग गरेको छ. , भारत बाट भन्दा नेपाल बाट फ्री तिब्बत को नारा र चीन लाई दबाब दिन सकिन्छ भन्ने कुरा अमेरिका लाई प्रस्ट थाह छ . 
नेपाल लाई निल्न भित्र भित्रै खोक्रो पार्न जरुरत थियो जसको लागि माओबादी को जन्म भयो. नभन्दै भारत ले चाए जसतै माओबादी ले देस लाई खोक्रो नै पार्यो , अब देस लाई आफै मा तुक्र्यौदै आफु मा बिलिन गर्न भारत ले  मधेस आन्दोलन , जनजाति लाइ उचाल्दै छ . र हाम्रा नेता को येस्तई चाल हुने हो भने अब त्यो दिन धेरै टाडा छैन . 
मलाई अरु मा भन्दा पनि दुख लागेको कुरा चै शाही नेपाली सेना ले भारत को येत्रो सद्येंत्र मा साथ दिनु ले हो. दरबार हत्या काण्ड लगत्तै एक भारतीय पत्रिका मा नेपाली सेना ५०० करोड मा बिकेको छापिएको थियो, पैले त विश्वास लागेको थेंन तर अब सब कुरो केलौदै जादा हो भन्ने लाग्छ . 
जुन देसको सेना अरु को मतियार बनेर देस लाई बिलिन गर्न खोज्छ , जुन देस को नेता बिदेको कुरा सुनेर देस लाइ खोक्रो बनाएर मुख्य मन्त्रि बन्ने सपना देख्छ , जुन देस को हामी जस्तो  सो called  शिक्षित् जनता कुरै नाबुजी हचुवा को भर मा काग को पछाडी दौदंचौ त्यो तेस्को भाबिस्से के हुन्छ सर्ब बिबित नै छ . देस अब को अवस्थामा धेरै बेर रह्यो भने  ्यालेस्टाइन जस्ताइ संसार को नक्सा बाट हराउछ 
भगवान श्री पशुपति नाथ ले हाम्रो देस को रक्षा गरुन 
Last edited: 15-Oct-12 09:24 AM

 
Posted on 10-15-12 10:36 AM     [Snapshot: 1320]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Kichkanni, thanks for posting the royal proclamation.  We have almost forgotten that speech and the motives behind his decision. 

 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 365 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
श्राद्द
TPS Re-registration
सेक्सी कविता - पार्ट २
What are your first memories of when Nepal Television Began?
पाप न साप घोप्टो पारि थाप !!
पुलिसनी संग - आज शनिवार - अन्तिम भाग
निगुरो थाहा छ ??
ChatSansar.com Naya Nepal Chat
Lets play Antakshari...........
What Happened to Dual Citizenship Bill
Basnet or Basnyat ??
Sajha has turned into MAGATs nest
NRN card pros and cons?
is Rato Bangala school cheating?
मेरो अम्रिका यात्रा -२
Do nepalese really need TPS?
कता जादै छ नेपाली समाज ??
susta manasthiti lai ke bhanchan english ma?
कृष्ण नै अन्तिम सत्य
Nas and The Bokas: Coming to a Night Club near you
Nas and The Bokas: Coming to a Night Club near you
राजदरबार हत्या काण्ड बारे....
Mr. Dipak Gyawali-ji Talk is Cheap. US sends $ 200 million to Nepal every year.
Harvard Nepali Students Association Blame Israel for hamas terrorist attacks
TPS Update : Jajarkot earthquake
is Rato Bangala school cheating?
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters