I would say yes. Try asking someone who is suffering more than you, they might have a different opinion.

NightElf · Mar 23, 2010 11:09 PM

hey buddy...ya obviously you do have the right to choose whatever u want... but u don't wanna choose death over suffering... i know it's hard but you will get through...  and u know... later when it's all over, u can look back and mayb laught at it... so just hang in there...

eaglefox12 · Mar 23, 2010 11:33 PM

yeah just hang in there man...I understand life can be hard..but you gotta battle it out! After every dark night, there is bright morning! yours is coming soon too!

mankokura · Mar 24, 2010 12:04 AM

Absolutely, you have the right to CHOOSE.  Now, therefore,  we have to compare between these two words which one has more weight and value in your life.  After we put both words "DEATH" & " SUFFERING" ON LADY JUSTICE'S SCALE TO BALANCE, WE FIND "DEATH" WEIGHT IS  ONLY EQUAL TO "SUFFE". BOTH ARE FIVE LETTER WORDS. BUT  "suffe" is a meaningless word, so as word "death" should be, too.  The remaining letters "RING" from the word "SUFFERING" implies you may have marriage in your life. Of course, marriage in life is a VALUE.  So, Again, I conclude that 'SUFFERING' has more weight and value in life. 

Sexy In Sari · Mar 24, 2010 12:14 AM

WTF sari .... j payo tei kya muuji

ktg · Mar 24, 2010 12:23 AM

nice issue! The Right to Die The Issue:  Does the Constitution protect the decision to end one's own life, at least if one is terminally ill or in great pain? The US Court first addressed the issue of the right to die in the 1990 case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.  In Cruzan, the Court considered whether Missouri could insist on proof by "clear and convincing evidence" of a comatose patient's desire to terminate her life before allowing her family's wish to disconnect her feeding tube to be carried out. Seven years later the Court faced right to die issues again in two cases involving challenges to laws criminalizing physician-assisted suicide.  The lower courts in each case, one involving a Washington state law and another a New York statute, found the laws unconstiutional--at least as applied (the 9th Circuit decision rested on due process right-to-privacy grounds, the 2nd Circuit decision on equal protection grounds.) The Supreme Court reversed in both cases, finding the laws to be constiutional. In 2006, in Gonzales v Oregon, the Court decided another right-to-die case, although this one primarily on administrative law grounds, not constitutional grounds.  EXTRACTED FROM: http://www.law.umkc.edu/facult... Happy reading!

santoshgiri · Mar 24, 2010 1:03 AM

legally NO

mucho_fiesta · Mar 24, 2010 7:06 AM

u cant dictates destiny.........onself need change, but not to the extend of extremist point of turn....life always about comprehend and many....its about spirituals, dedication,idealism and comittment, interestingly u had t be articulates enough bout ur partakings spiritually.....such cooking is spiritual for sum one else point of view, writing also is sprituals in others thinking of action, even dancing and listen t music is healing spirituals for sum reason....in most vocation matters are spirituals..... superficially oneself need  dose of responsibility upon duty of life , ultimately its the spiritual essence you had to added with to champion the metaphoric sufferings...  Last edited: 24-Mar-10 06:25 PM

natyavaruval · Mar 24, 2010 6:23 PM

SIS, That was just tons of bullshit. Hilarious nevertheless.

N · Mar 25, 2010 7:07 AM