Archimedes once explained that if a foreign object exerts some force on the water, it in return puts an upwards pressure which makes the object lighter and able to float. Likewise Mr. Prachanda, the political-physicist of the modern Nepal revolted for a decade and applied force on the Nepalese society which was turned and turmoil. To overcome the pressure the society put an upward pressure, in the form of “Jana-Andolan II”. Unwanted water, the king was displaced out of the container. And Maoism once a foreign object is now freely floating. But are they hovering safely?

Archimedes also explained that more flatten the surface of the object, more stable it is. Maoists had chances to flatten their surface, didn’t they? They got a couple of positions in the new portfolio, legalized a fraction of their firearms, and got ample of opportunities to freely express their philosophy. But did they capitalize? I recently heard that they are mobilizing half a million cadres for nationwide agitation. Is it possible to run a nation from the office and the road simultaneously? They have Armed Police Force to guard five of their ministers, and they wipe out the APF barracks. Is that politically reasonable? Mr. Prachanda, the supremo accused reactionary forces trying to kill diplomats and promised to fulfill the claim with evidence, which was never again heard about. Is a visionary leader not accountable for his public speeches?

I once thought Maoists are not after political power, rather a revolutionary force that sweeps dust and cleans the slate. I thought they will behave once they come out of the jungle. All I see is breach of codes and conducts. No it’s not that, civil leaders are disciplined. But big changes need patience, isn’t it? Why are they so mesmerized in their muscle power? Is this power not piercing their surface? Hello! Archimedes principle does hold for uneven surfaces. Will they not sink?

Nice Analysis arunima. Its rather a one way anti-maoism. But ya they do worth it. Worth reading. Keep it up.

They will sink. They are actually doing good by helping people to understand and show their real faces. If you've ever listened Prachanda's interview, you'll understand that he just doen't want to understand and listen anything against him/them. Why did we need to replace monarchy? just to replace it with another monster, even worse than the former? Mahara's recent statements to justify atrocities against journalists, governments reluctancy and inability to punish any of those culprits and criminals, Matrika yadav assuring all prisoners for the release for New Nepal, and the goverment not addressing the issues of Madhesh; with that we all can see the real face of maoists, and the incapability of government.

"To overcome the pressure the society put an upward pressure, in the form of "Jana-Andolan II"."

If I am not mistaken, your foreign object is (Prachanda) and water (Nepalese society)

In the first line you say, the liquid (water) in turn applies upward pressure to the foreign object, which in your case is Prachanda. But Jana-Andolan II was not against Prachanda or Maoists; it was in fact against the KG or the monarchy.

Monarchy was/is a part of the Nepalese society, so I guess, under the present scenario, you could refer to it as “unwanted water” that is displaced out of the container. But the problem I see with that analogy is while the king still has chance, at least theoretically(due to influence of the society--water), to come back to the power (ceremonial or otherwise), the displaced water cannot come back by itself (or due to water in the container) to the container again.

Good thinking though!