[Show all top banners]


More by polisci
What people are reading
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 Pfizer says they are sorry
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 05-15-24 7:50 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    

(Photo: Getty Images)© Provided by Enstarz

According to the Preskription Medicines Code of Practice Authority, Pfizer promoted unlicensed medicines and violated a total of five regulatory codes. 

The pharmaceutical giant has been accused of "bringing discredit" to the industry after employees promoted the COVID-19 vaccine across social media during the height of the pandemic. 

Per Biopharma-reporter, medical director of Pfizer Dr. Berkley Phillips retweeted a post on Twitter, now known as X, stating: "Our vaccine candidate is 95% effective in preventing COVID and 94% effective in people over 65 years old." 

"We will file all of our data with health authorities within days. Thank you to every volunteer in our trial, and to all who are tirelessly fighting this pandemic." Per the medical news outlet, fellow UK employees retweeted the reported misleading post.

The complaint against Pfizer cites the "promotional use of Twitter." The panel ruled a "breach" for the following clauses of the 2019 code, including bringing discredit to the pharmaceutical industry, promoting unlicensed medicine, making a misleading claim, not listing adverse effects, and failing to maintain high standards. 

(Photo: Preskription Medicines Code of Practice Authority)© Provided by Enstarz

"The complainant alleged the tweet included relative efficacy rates without any information about absolute efficacy rates and that no safety data or safety information was provided, and therefore that Pfizer had misleadingly and illegally promoted its COVID-19 vaccine," the case summary alleged. 

According to Bio-Pharma Reporter, the misjudged tweets cost Pfizer £34,800, or $43,698.36 in administrative costs. In the end, Dr. Phillips claimed the tweet was "accidental and unintentional."

(Photo by Kena Betancur/VIEWpress)© Provided by Enstarz

Dr. Ila Bhatia told Bio-Pharma that the unrefined behavior on their behalf was "less than ideal," however noted that it's more important that the information was never shared from the pharma giant's official handles. 

"Such events lead to poor public perception, not just for the company and its brand but also the industry as a whole," she told the medical news outlet.

(Photo Illustration by Mateusz Slodkowski/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)© Provided by Enstarz

Bio-Pharma obtained a statement from a spokesman of Pfizer, claiming the company is "deeply sorry" and "fully recognizes and accepts" the issues highlighted by the PMCPA ruling.

On the other hand, Pfizer claimed it took its commitment to the code extremely seriously and had conducted a thorough investigation. Per the website, the case was received February 2023 and was marked completed as of March 1. 

See more on the full report regarding Complaint V. Pfizer here


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.



Within last 7 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS Re-registration case still pending ..
Why Americans reverse park?
whats wrong living with your parents ?
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters