[Show all top banners]

Back to: Current Affairs

Refresh page to view new replies Enter your email and submit: You will be notified when someone replies to this thread     PLEASE ENTER VALID EMAIL!

[VIEWED 2800 TIMES] SAVE! for ease of future access. LOG IN TO ACCESS THIS FEATURE. Or you can enter your email here to get the link emailed to you

View User Profile View User Postings gaule_hero Please log in to subscribe to gaule_hero's postings. Posted on 04-11-08 10:21 PM     Reply [Subscribe]

Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?

I am very surprised by the election results thus far. Like most of the intelligentsia i.e. those who form opinion based on Nepali vernaculars rather than hands-on experience, I had thought that if the election was free and fair Maoists would lose but the running total suggests otherwise . By all accounts, the election was free and fair notwithstanding few violent incidents - given the enormous stake, the violent history of the country and the political culture of S. Asia Nepal's election was exemplary - and if Maoists win we should respect the results. The question is why are Maoists doing so well unexpectedly. There are couple of theories (1) Voter intimidation. I would believe voter intimidation to work in the rural areas (Maoists supposedly claim that they can see the ballot papers on binoculars) but  NOT in the metropolis like Kathmandu. (2) If Maoists lose, we are back to square one. I don't buy this argument. If voters had marginalized the Maoists, then they would have lost their political legitimacy. Instead of a political movement it would have been a simple criminal outfit. (3) Ballot stuffing/bringing voters from other areas. I am sure such things are going on but they are not monopoly of the Maoists. Just yesterday, Congress' Khum B Khadka was accused of doing the same. If this results hold, then it would mean that Nepalese people have finally decided that the old political establishment was not upto the task of creating a New Nepal. After all the Congress and the UML had their chances to make the difference during the 1990s and they missed their chances because they internal, petty fights. I for sure cannot imagine Girija & Deupa being a PM again. View/Share this post only

Your Banner Here

---

Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

Recommended Popular Threads

Controvertial Threads

What are your first memories of when Nepal Television Began? निगुरो थाहा छ ?? TPS Re-registration case still pending .. Basnet or Basnyat ?? Sajha has turned into MAGATs nest Nas and The Bokas: Coming to a Night Club near you मन भित्र को पत्रै पत्र! TPS Work Permit/How long your took? काेराेना सङ्क्रमणबाट बच्न Immunity बढाउन के के खाने ?How to increase immunity against COVID - 19? Breathe in. Breathe out. Guess how many vaccines a one year old baby is given अमेरिकामा बस्ने प्राय जस्तो नेपालीहरु सबै मध्यम बर्गीय अथवा माथि (higher than middle class) चितवनको होस्टलमा १३ वर्षीया शालिन पोखरेल झुण्डिएको अवस्था - बलात्कार पछि हत्याको शंका - होस्टेलहरु असुरक्षित शीर्षक जे पनि हुन सक्छ। Why Americans reverse park? They are openly permitting undocumented immigrants to participate in federal elections in Arizona now. Driver license help ASAP sathiharu Travelling to Nepal - TPS AP- PASSPORT Nepali doctors future black or white usa ? Doctors dying suddenly or unexpectedly since the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines

Nas and The Bokas: Coming to a Night Club near you

NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.