Here goes Deepak Gyawali:

http://www.nepalnews.com/ntimes/issue202/guest_column.htm

He defends King and that is understandable why is he defending King,
paying back the debts of being Minister, rather than a real need and
the justifications given in the article are not that strong ....
"King is nassso", that reference to justify King's deed are not
real justifiable reason. I am not satisfied with King who ejected
Deoba as "inept" for Deoba's inability to conduct election in 6months
failed himself to conduct election in another 1.5 years and now
brought back the same PM. Well, its politics and in Nepali politics
no one looks INEPT, nor any one is corrupt: I was so much furious
to see Wagle and Gachhedar seating beside Deoba, I really hate
the way Nepali leaders defy the rules of honesty.

GP

Deepak Gyawali's father was a Minister (pancha). It just runs in his blood.

And I guess all of you know that the Dixits are his Mawali's so he gets all the hype.

Dipak Gyawali comes across as:

(1) Justifying British imperialism .. the Churchill view was that the Indiana can not govern themselves, so the British have to do it for them..

(2) Justifying royal activism. ... A constitutional monarch is politically irrelevant. King G has been anything but. ..... Gyawali does not see much difference between Chand, Thapa, and Deuba. That is telling.