Who produced Maoists and what the producer/s doing now?

There you go.... all (1), (2), (3) and (4) are faggots.... who produced Maoists, then Maoists must be the worst.

Marx

mother fugger faggots. what kind of Qs is this. Who produce Maoist gor ray?
why don;t you ask maiost leader.

If the need of division arose from " inablility to reconize others identity and insensitivity..." then "only threat to nepals divide is inablility to reconize others identity and insensitivity..." IS definite.

Then, why do so?

भ्र्स्टचार produced Maosist.
But they have lost their way and forgot what is it they truly were fighting for and now they have gone tooo far with every thing.

It is a politics cycle running round and round and round.

Nepali politician = १२ बर्ष कुकुरको पुछर धुङ्रोमा रख्यो बाङ्गा को बाङ्गै

by the way delineation of administrative boundry is not a division of country... i think discussion here is will it divide country?

by the way delineation of administrative boundry is not division of the country. There are all other factors that plays role in systemnatic delineation of administrative boundry in the process of restructuring the state? Eg. Geography, history, socio-cultural distribution, economics... I think the question of discussion here is Will this delineation in somesort of ethnic line has potential to divide the country? or it might be opposite (unite the country in real sense considering the ground reality)? We also have to understand interwinding realtions between all the factors... No answer might be right or wrong... its more about which is more feasible....

I think the division of administrative boundary "on the basis of ethnicity' WILL divide country too.

For example, suppose division happened last year. Then I will fall in the region where there are many magars and gurungs. Actually, i will be the minority in that place. So, whenever I will introduce myself to people from other regions, then they "MIGHT" think that I was supposed to be magar/gurung..... bla bla..only because I am from that place...bla bla.. which will not make me feel good.. secondly, since the devision is done giving the priority to those people, administration might be influenced by them soo much that they forget that other people exist there... this will only increase the ethnic consciousness , rather say over-consciousness, which leads to sense of 'not-belonging' to that place, then differences, and finally UNITY WILL BE BROKEN.

my thoughts.

Mao Tse Tung produced the Maoist. End of research.

Isn't that the same thing is happening right now... istead of you its them... and worse of all is power is centralized only in you... that is why minority have started asking for their right... definetly just reversing it is not the solution... there should be proportional representation with devolution of power... with equity... sense of cummunalism might disappear ... reservation is no solution coz you are saying you are inferior... so their should be resepectable representation.. yet! federal structure in line of ethnicity is still a very delicate balance which needs to be well thought... i agree that there is risk of commuanl riot if not handled carefully... remeber, sense of communalism is byproduct of marginalization and oppression, and it can sometime also be sense of superiority and egoism...

exactly, if we still need to fight to get proper recognition even after federal system, why introduce it at all.. why not amend the situation from the existing situation by introducing proper reservations for the minorities. I would rather consider introduction of federal system as more 'playing around' with the sentiments than trying to improve the situation. more playing= more marginalization of more groups (like in see-saw) = more hatred = ethnic clash = civil war = death of nepal.