|
[VIEWED 246186
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AznshawtY
Please log in to subscribe to AznshawtY's postings.
Posted on 01-16-07 9:53
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
A doctor in Michigan has a sister who lives in California but the sister does not have any brother that lives in Michigan, how come?? :P
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Guest4
Please log in to subscribe to Guest4's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 12:36
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
*twins there = two eldest
|
| |
|
|
ritthe_jasus
Please log in to subscribe to ritthe_jasus's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 2:49
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
republic, I think i have the solution, its just in my head i have not tried on paper yet, correct me if I am wrong. soln, you leave one stack, weigh only 9 stacks but with following order 1st stack -- 1 coin 2nd stack -- 2 coins 3rd stack -- 3 coins 4th -- 4 5th -- 5 6th -- 6 7th -- 7 8th -- 8 9th -- 9 if it was all 100 gm coins it would weight (x)=900+800+700+600+500+400+300+200+100 When we weight if the weight is equal to x, then the odd coin is from the stack that we left out. if the weight is 10 gram less its the 1st stack 20 gm less -- 2nd stack 30 gm less -- 3rd stack 40 gm less -- 4th stack 50 gm less -- 5th stack 60 gm less -- 6yh stack 70 gm less -- 7th stack 80 gm less -- 8th stack 90 gm less -- 9th stack I think thats the answer ....... damn it was a good one. thank you republic keep it coming.
|
| |
|
|
ritthe_jasus
Please log in to subscribe to ritthe_jasus's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 3:00
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Timetraveller, Guest's total 14 logic makes sense as that is the ony possibility for the mathematician to get confused as she already knows the number of windows ...... as opposed to ur 3 solutions but your logic of red hair makes sense than guest's as mathematician just wanted to make sure wheather there is elder or not, didnot want to know abt the red hair in fact.
|
| |
|
|
slowPoison
Please log in to subscribe to slowPoison's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 3:41
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Here is a new question. A farmer called his five sons and distributed the some oranges among them as below: 1st: 100 oranges 2nd: 80 3rd: 60 4th: 40 5th: 30 Then the farmer asked his son to go to five different places to sell the oranges. The conditions set are: 1. They can not redistribute the oranges. 2. All oranges should be sold at same rate. 3. Final collection should be equal for each. Now what is the rate offered and final collection?
|
| |
|
|
Slackdemic
Please log in to subscribe to Slackdemic's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 4:25
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Ah! Interesting question - answer going on here...Before, I look into other questions and solutions, I think I would work on slow poison's question. A question, though--you mean, that they all can sell as many oranges as they want, but the price has to be same, right?
|
| |
|
|
slowPoison
Please log in to subscribe to slowPoison's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 4:38
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Not as many. The number is fixed. For first son only 100 secod: only 80 third: 60 fourth: 40 and last one: 30 no more no less same rate same sum
|
| |
|
|
Slackdemic
Please log in to subscribe to Slackdemic's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 4:43
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
No, what I mean is they have got the different number of oranges, but they can sell as much as they want, right? If not, how can you sell 100 oranges at the same rate to 80 oranges and get the total amount equal? :S
|
| |
|
|
slowPoison
Please log in to subscribe to slowPoison's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 4:50
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
They can not sell what ever they want. They have to sell all. Seems impossible! But not.
|
| |
|
|
Slackdemic
Please log in to subscribe to Slackdemic's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 4:53
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
They didn't sell any. That is the only mathmatical solution I can come up with. :)
|
| |
|
|
Slackdemic
Please log in to subscribe to Slackdemic's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 4:55
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Or, the rate/orange they gave was $0.00 and sold ALL! :D
|
| |
|
|
slowPoison
Please log in to subscribe to slowPoison's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 4:59
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
I was not expecting this answer Seems I have to give a Hint. They sold all oranges in two shift but with same rate in each shift.
|
| |
|
|
CHYAME KANCHA
Please log in to subscribe to CHYAME KANCHA's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 5:21
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
the orange is simple lets say if A sold each orange in one rupee then he got 100 rupees, then B sold his oranges at 1.25 each and collected 100 rupees similarly C sold at lets say 1.66 per orange and collected 100 rupees and so on or is it that i misunderstood the question
|
| |
|
|
Please log in to subscribe to 's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 5:46
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Is it this way? lets only consider two sons, with 100 and 80 oranges. A sold 96 atr 0.5 and got 48rs. And 4 atr 1 to make 4. total 52rs. B sold 56 atr 0.5 to make 28rs. 24 atr 1 to make 24. total 52.
|
| |
|
|
ritthe_jasus
Please log in to subscribe to ritthe_jasus's postings.
Posted on 01-21-07 9:00
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
maranchyase got the answer i think, what is the answer slowpoison ..........
|
| |
|
|
timetraveller
Please log in to subscribe to timetraveller's postings.
Posted on 01-22-07 1:38
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
oops. my apologies. gues 4 is right. there are two different sums. and several younger twins possibility. sorry. but yeah, that is the answer.
|
| |
|
|
slowPoison
Please log in to subscribe to slowPoison's postings.
Posted on 01-22-07 7:08
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Maranchyse answer won't work for 40 and 30 case. The the idea is rite. This is my answer First shift: 11 oranges @ 1 Rs person no. sold money collected no. remained A(100) 99 9 1 B (80) 77 7 3 C (60) 55 5 5 D (40) 33 3 7 E(30) 22 2 8 Second Shift: 1 orange @ 1 Rs person sold total money A 1 9+1=10 B 3 7+3=10 C 5 5+5=10 D 7 3+7=10 E 8 2+8=10 This idea works for any number multiple of 10 and less than or equal to 100.
|
| |
|
|
slowPoison
Please log in to subscribe to slowPoison's postings.
Posted on 01-22-07 7:10
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Sory the tabular format is changed so calculete with the rate given.
|
| |
|
|
republican
Please log in to subscribe to republican's postings.
Posted on 01-22-07 11:36
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
A ten-volume encyclopedia is arranged on a bookshelf - each volume has 1000 pages. If a bookworm starts eating the pages from the first page of volume 1 and stops when it eats the last page of volume 10, how many pages does it eat? Assume it eats all the pages in order and ignores the covers.
|
| |
|
|
bhariya007
Please log in to subscribe to bhariya007's postings.
Posted on 01-22-07 11:38
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Doctor can also be famale.
|
| |
|
|
slowPoison
Please log in to subscribe to slowPoison's postings.
Posted on 01-22-07 12:20
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
| |
Republican! I guess the answer is 1+8*1000+1 =8002
|
| |