Inductive Supreme - Sajha Mobile
SAJHA MOBILE
Inductive Supreme
Posts 3 · Viewed 3170 · Go to Last Post
Don.Corleone
· Snapshot
Like · Likedby · 0
Do you think there is someone in this world, more superior to you ? I went about asking this question to so many people that I found time to talk about, some Christians, some Atheists by logical reasoning, some Hindus and a few Muslims as well and expected an honest personal answer from each of these people. I was indeed surprised when I realized all of them acknowledging that they do not consider themselves the all powerful man in this world. So if every one believes or has faith that there is always someone better than "himself" in whatever instant of time should that not be the truth then. If everybody not all fools think, there is someone/something that is more capable of each one of them considered individually, should it be called faith, intelligence or ignorance ? Here comes the mathematical induction, with initial hypothesis in comparing two people A and B from the world's population. One of A or B is superior. That is, given a choice of survival for their life only one will survive. But both A and B believe that there is someone else that is much more capable of survival than either of them. If someone did organize this as a connected chain over an entire population under consideration marking who is superior to whom, there will be exactly one person left with the entire world that believes there is someone/something superior to him that always exists. This combines with the irony that he "exists" for the present and the assumption he "will" for the future. How do you relate happiness with the Supreme being? In this relativistic world, happiness and ambition are goals derived by comparing ourselves with the rest of the world, competing ourselves with the rest of the world. This kind of happiness is not permanent. It is matter of time that every human will have to endear and experience sorrow/ defeat in the route to achieving materialistic goals. The absolute happiness lies in the person not placing his well being at the mercy of somebody else's existence. This attachment/relation with the society could be in the form of affection to his own parents, love for his wife and children, ambition to achieve a monetary goal or jealousy with an office colleague or a vindictive attitude towards a competitor. If we can visualize the idea of the Supreme being as a person in thought space, happiness with respect to the Supreme Being is like vesting your interest in that thought space. Happiness is what your mind derives out of associating the feelings like love, affection, jealousy, vengeance etc. towards the the great person that you have created in your mind as Supernatural. Now the immediate question, what if such a supernatural does not exist in real life. Does it really matter ? Are you not feeling happy already ? You will not be thinking about this question, if you have realized Absolute happiness! I define this as the Absolute value of happiness. Why do so many religions exist ? While words like convenience, miraculous occurrence, evolution and non-existence exist precisely to confuse the common man, I am going to add yet another mathematical connotation from the inverse problem theory. Roughly speaking, "inverse problems" can be understood as problems where the answer is known, but not the question. Or where the results, or consequences are known, but not the cause. A simple example would be to consider three streams that join to form a river. Given for a fact that three factories are flushing known amounts of pollutant into the streams, it is the forward problem to be able to calculate the resulting pollution in the river. The inverse problem tries to answer which pollutant came from which factory given a sample of the polluted stream. As can be seen, there is infinite number of solutions to the inverse problem. We exist as humans with a definite thought process. The urge to know and satisfy ourselves with the cause for our existence hence becomes the inverse problem. Obviously, one should expect infinite answers.
sugar
· Snapshot
Like · Liked by · 0
Anything that exists must be created, so who you think created God ?
Don.Corleone
· Snapshot
Like · Liked by · 0
Do I believe in God ? Intelligence demands that I believe. The world the way I see needs a history for creation. Let me start with the universe. Scientific knowledge formulates an ever-expanding universe. What makes the universe expand. What is the force behind the rotation of the earth, the creation of the sun, the solar systems and the umpteen galaxies in the universe. Getting into the earth, how was water created, how was air created, how did the trees come into existence ? If humans were designed, what an impeccable designer is behind it. Intuitively, though physics can explain a phenomenon in equations and forces, it is very logical for me to accept a super force behind the creation of all other forces. There is a theory that argues based on what if everything happens by chance, so to say Hydrogen met with Oxygen to say "Lets get wet". How did the hydrogen come and where was oxygen all the while? Why did they have to interact at that time and place. If anyone is convinced that Chance let that happen, I am convinced that Chance is the way that you have perceived God without realizing it. As a human you have no choice in the way "Chance" will behave and you keep thinking all your life that "Chance" will smile your way too. So if you call this atheism, I only see it as a road to realize something that is "Supreme". Who is that God ? Does he have a form? God is the "Absolute" power behind the universe. He is the "Creator", "Destroyer" and the "Protector". Assigning a form to him is interpretive. It is wrong to question His form. As humans when we try visualizing him, we are trying to use the knowledge of the brain and the eye to interpret the form. It is wrong to conclude that he is formless because we can not see him, and also is not right to blindly accept a form and be fanatic about it. The process of visualization is more of a relativistic experience/interpretation and hence is individualistic. It is not worth arguing that God has a form or is formless. The realization is more significant than the visualization. Do you think the destiny is predetermined ? I think so. Timelines are relative. I want to use Einstein's "Twin Paradox" to explain. If one of the two twins is given a free ride traveling at the speed of light or more to another planet say Jupiter and comes back and he takes 50 years the twin who went on the travel will still be 0 years old, while the twin in the earth would have aged to 50 years. The twin that was traveling at the speed of light was never in the time frame of the earth and so was not aging at all. Thinking on the same lines, light from the stars that made the earth suitable for a living started a few years back on the earth. The rays so emitted created the earth. This is the destiny. When go you back in time ( I am not talking about the past but the origin), you have no space to define time and when the reference space is fixed we have restricted our timeline also.
Please log in to reply to this post

You can also log in using your Facebook
View in Desktop
What people are reading
You might like these other discussions...
· Posts 2 · Viewed 343
· Posts 7 · Viewed 1282 · Likes 1
· Posts 5 · Viewed 576
· Posts 79 · Viewed 19294 · Likes 19
· Posts 1 · Viewed 132
· Posts 2 · Viewed 332
· Posts 1 · Viewed 88
· Posts 1 · Viewed 97
· Posts 1 · Viewed 200
· Posts 1 · Viewed 188



Your Banner Here
Travel Partners
Travel House Nepal