Simple TPS question

Posts 4 · Viewed 4116 · Go to Last Post

· Snapshot 0

Like · Likedby · 0

So USCIS says "Continues living in US since 24th June", teso bhanna le July 24th dekhi US ma basi raheko, right?
Why would they want someone living from 24th, instead of living before 24th.
Shouldn't it be like this "Continues living in US On/Before 24th"?
Anyway I am just curious :)

Can someone have two status. So if someone in F1 apply for TPS, his/her F1 status terminated. I am little confuse about it. I know we can't have two EADs, but what about two status.

Thanks for your input.

Your Banner Here

ny2

· Snapshot 45

Like · Liked by · 0

Nepal was granted a TPS on 24th. TPS is given with the fact that it is not a favorable condition to go to Nepal due to the earthquake disaster. It does not matter whether a person has been living in US decades before or one day before 24th june, if that person has gone to Nepal after 24th June, USCIS might reject TPS for him, the reason being he felt comfortable to travel to Nepal. That's why USCIS wanted the continuous presence from 24th June, the day it granted TPS for Nepal.

As posted in so many earlier posts, you can have F1 and TPS side by side.

MimroRaMero

· Snapshot 94

Like · Liked by · 0

Thanks for your reply.
So if some one travel to Nepal on Advance parole after TPS is granted, does it gonna affect on TPS renewal?

bikash_001

· Snapshot 194

Like · Liked by · 0

mimroRaMero,
I think if one goes for a short visit citing family emergency then should not be a problem, I think. However, if one goes for a vacation of 3 months, then USCIS might consider that this person is not really affected by earthquake in Nepal, so could return back from port of entry. However, if goes for a period of 15 days or a month for unavoidable circumstances then should not be a problem to return or reapply for extension. However, need to talk a lawyer for confirmation. This is just my understanding.

Please log in to reply to this post

You can also log in using your Facebook