Raja ko followerharu - Sajha Mobile
SAJHA MOBILE
Raja ko followerharu
Posts 5 · Viewed 5148 · Likes 1 · Go to Last Post
shrestha babu
· Snapshot 0
Like · Likedby · 0
Ajkal nepalma raja ko charcha badhna thaleko chha. Khasma rajako followerharu rana, shah, chettri, thapa, basnet, singh ra ek dui bahun jaatko hunchha. Haal ko sthiti herda raja nai deshko lagi ramro thiyo jasto laagna thalyo.
magorkhe1
· Snapshot 47
Like · Liked by · 0
Peoples should have given a choice, keep him as a constitutional monarch or let him be a citizen.
Girija was too greedy for the Presidential position and said okay. 

Gyanendra did stupid things too, he wanted to rule as Mahendra did. 

Maoist made him ( Girija ) puppet (or  became puppet )  on many political decisions. 

Last edited: 20-Feb-15 12:15 PM
ujl
· Snapshot 156
Like · Liked by · 1
King Bharat of Hastenapur didn't brought the system of making kings just by the lineage. In fact, he didn't find his nine sons fit to be the king of Hastenapur, so he appointed someone else (Bhumanyu) from his kingdom to be the king. This was the justice given by king Bharat to his people. He put a fine line between karma and birth and he called Kurukshetra a Dharma-khestra. Karma was given an upper status than birth in the great Kingdom of Hastenapur. A king must poses certain qualities, if he doesn't have these qualities, he is not fit to be a king.

How can I accept Paras as my king? I cannot accept a drug addict to be the ruler of Nepal. How can Paras give justice to people and Nepal whose consciousness is always deluded by tranquilizers? When birth is given an upper status than karma, corruption starts that very moment. The kingship had to collapse in Nepal because it was becoming too corrupt. Looking the present scenario, Nepal looked better when ruled by king Gyanendra, but it was no good than Rana Regime. Ranas established schools for themselves and gave way to Nepotism. Gyanendra was establishing the same Nepotism and Chakari Pratha in Nepal.

Kingship and Democracy both works when people understand the meaning of these words. Kings in Kingship and Ministers in Democracy must adhere to the duties given to them by the people. Kingship works when there is a force to check kingship; democracy works when there is a force to check democracy. Both system fails when birth is given an upper status than karma.

When Chanakya was about to make Chandragupt the new Samrat of Magadh Kingdom, the so called upper caste Brahmins opposed the idea of Chanakya because Chandragupt was from Maurya lineage, a caste considered unfit for the status of king. But Chanakya explained these Brahmins that Purusha Sukta doesn't discriminate any Varnas saying this is superior or this is inferior. Such is the history of Vedic culture where Karma was superior than anything. "Karmanyavadikarestu ma faleshu kadachana" : You only have rights to perform actions here, you do not have any control over the fruits of your action. (Bhagavat Gita 2.47)
Kiddo
· Snapshot 210
Like · Liked by · 0
I might not agree on everything you said, but I sure enjoy reading your anecdotes. Please keep writing.
divorceguy
· Snapshot 461
Like · Liked by · 0
flipping a birdie for a King
Please log in to reply to this post

You can also log in using your Facebook
View in Desktop
What people are reading
You might like these other discussions...
· Posts 1 · Viewed 68
· Posts 1 · Viewed 222
· Posts 4 · Viewed 663
· Posts 2 · Viewed 330
· Posts 12 · Viewed 1700 · Likes 3
· Posts 5 · Viewed 529
· Posts 1 · Viewed 118
· Posts 1 · Viewed 103
· Posts 7 · Viewed 678
· Posts 9 · Viewed 825



Your Banner Here
Travel Partners
Travel House Nepal