Hope for old TPS holder is still alive
The head of SUpreme court conservative judge who handed presidential immunity to trump has dared to speak aganist him yesterday. Trump demanded an impeachment or removal of federal judges who ruled deportation plan aganist him.
Robert says ““For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
So my point of bringing this here is Old TPs holders will never be removed from this country . DHS will be unsuccesful to revoke tps for nepal and other countries since federal judge will step in to protect it. Just my opinion.
Last edited: 19-Mar-25 01:14 PM
DHS le court ko order nai manna chodi sakyo. Bichara judge le mageko document mukhai ma dinna bhandyo DOJ le. Judge le rokla bhanera chai aas nagare huncha aba.
If court orders r ignored I think we have a bigger problem than termination of TPS lol!
There is no hope for anything unless they pass a new law by house and senate.Assylum cases interview or court date has almost 0 chance of approval.lawyer has no chance to talk .Judge says directly, no where in the world has any crisis.all these documents you have presented are fake.now you have 30 days to get out of this country
Greatwave, there is definitely more problems than TPS right now. Aba yestai para ho bhane arko chunab ni hudaina hola.
Feri 2028 ma pani trump uthnere.feri arko term ko lagi.i don't know how but that's what they are saying
Uthna ni pardaina hola tyo bela ta. Constitution Amendment nagari uthaune ho bhane ta chunab nai nagare bhai halyo ni. Trump uthyo bhane Dems le Obama uthaula lol
Asylum file garera hariyo patta banaune keta keti harule chito nagarik file garihala kata keti ho greencard ko bhar chaina khosdina sakxa.bhutani haru lai ta chodechaina
Your perspective brings forward an interesting angle on the situation. It's true that the judicial system often serves as a check on executive actions, including matters related to immigration. The statement from Chief Justice John Roberts emphasizes the independence of the judiciary and the appropriate processes for reviewing judicial decisions.Regarding Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Nepal and other countries, the situation remains complex and subject to legal and political developments. While it's hopeful to believe that federal judges will step in to protect TPS holders, it is important to remain informed about ongoing legal proceedings and government policies.For TPS holders, it's crucial to stay updated on any announcements from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and keep in touch with immigration lawyers or advocacy groups who can provide guidance based on the latest legal developments. While the judiciary can indeed act as a safeguard, the outcome of legal cases can vary, so maintaining awareness and preparedness is essential.
Sajha Ai
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SjoT7XoVKyg
Please log in to reply to this post
You can also log in using your Facebook
What people are reading
You might like these other discussions...
