Judge may grant partial TPS stay for named plaintiffs only.

Posts 5 · Viewed 987 · Go to Last Post

· Snapshot 0

Like · Likedby · 0

If you were a member of the National TPS Alliance before July 7, 2025, you qualify as a Nepal TPS holder and, under the judge’s partial stay, will keep your work permit, protection from deportation, and all other TPS benefits while the case is pending.

By asking both sides to address the Supreme Court’s scope‑of‑relief test from Trump v. CASA, Inc., the Judge signals she’s inclined toward a partial stay just for those members.

The government further explains that relief would extend only to those who were bona fide members of the National TPS Alliance at the time the complaint was filed—July 7, 2025.

Yesterday, the judge sent a question asking the government to spell out exactly what TPS rights the people who sued will keep if only they get a stay. She wants to know things like

How will those named keep their work permits?
How will they avoid deportation while the case goes on?
Will they still get health care and other benefits tied to TPS?
How will DHS track and confirm it applies only to those individuals?

In plain terms, she’s making sure the government can show how it will give full TPS protections to just the plaintiffs named in this lawsuit.

Kaji khadka

· Snapshot 44

Like · Liked by · 0

my membership was accepted on July 8.

Jindagi yestai chha

· Snapshot 63

Like · Liked by · 0

Hawaa

Sexy In Sari

· Snapshot 85

Like · Liked by · 0

If the judge grants relief on the government’s proposed terms and scope, the government will not appeal to the Ninth Circuit—a result that’s best for TPS holders.

Jindagi yestai chha

· Snapshot 116

Like · Liked by · 0

Just to be clear, members will only get this benefits?? Others khhoya?? Can u clarify?

Please log in to reply to this post

You can also log in using your Facebook