Nepal's ex-king eyes royal return

Archived from the original Sajha.com — preserved as posted, replies can no longer be added here.
Start a New Discussion
Archived Post

The former king of Nepal, Gyanendra, has said that he hopes the country's centuries-old Hindu monarchy may one day be restored. Gyanendra - who was deposed in 2008 when the monarchy was abolished - said that he did not believe it had ended. He was ousted after Nepal's Maoists, who had fought a decade-long civil war for a republic, won elections in 2008. The BBC's Joanna Jolly in Nepal says that the former king's views are unlikely to be taken seriously. Our correspondent says that while there has been speculation that he may make a comeback, most mainstream political leaders reacted by dismissing his claims as irrelevant. 'Ups and downs' "I don't believe that the monarchy has ended," the former king said in a rare interview late on Wednesday on Nepal's Avenues Television. "History shows that the monarchy has had its ups and downs... But I will do whatever the people want me do." Gyanendra came to the throne in 2001 after his nephew - the then crown prince Dipendra - gunned down most of the royal family before shooting himself. Gyanendra's brother, King Birendra, was killed as was his sister-in-law, Queen Aishwarya. Gyanendra's popularity plummeted when he sacked the government and took control of the country in 2005. He argued that the mainstream parties had failed to tackle the Maoist insurgency. But his takeover backfired when mass protests forced the reinstatement of parliament. The Maoists went on to win subsequent elections and Nepal was declared a republic, ending 240 years of monarchy, in May 2008. The former king - who admitted in his interview that his power grab had been a mistake - has kept a low profile since he was ousted. "I left [the throne] without objections so that this country would see peace and prosperity. My forefathers united this country and I hope that unity will not broken," Gyanendra said. He was speaking as Nepal's lawmakers continue with their struggle to draft a new constitution, which correspondents say is unlikely to be completed by a 28 May deadline. Story from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr...

BathroomCoffee · Mar 25, 2010 9:30 AM · 3,181 views

8 Replies

I am not pro-king but the people should have given a choice to choose or loose because it was too early to do many things at a time. His fate should be in the hand of Nepali. Nepali Army was united under king and loyal to country as they did to king. Maoist wanted to infiltrate army putting  his cadets and take over the power. Many of us read about the army general Rukmad Katwal, but he saved the army as a national guard but not a puppet of any party. I do not know how many of you believe it, he saved the army from Maoist infiltration.   Once gone, I think it is hard to be in, other than Indian will take part in restating his power. But I do not see that will be going to happen.

syanjali · Mar 25, 2010 10:13 AM

Yeah i am not a fan of King or any Political Party in Nepal. But it is interesting to see how optimistic he is. he he :) Yeah I agree with you that military should stay out of politics.

BathroomCoffee · Mar 25, 2010 10:50 AM

If king wants to stay as ceremonial and out of power than whats wrong about that? Nepalese politician will get one less reason to fight (for the post of president) and now I don't think there are any qualifying man for such big post !!!

amricane · Mar 25, 2010 11:34 AM

Army had always been loyal to the king. You never know! 

tamanglakola · Mar 25, 2010 1:22 PM

I agree with tamanglakola: Nepal army is in some way loyal to the King. Gynanedra avoided bloodshed by returning the power to its people on Bhadra 19th. If he wanted to use the force, RNA (at the time) could kill many in thousand. I wish he could have used army and Makune, Prachande, Girija, Gachhadar, Sujata, etc. all got killed at that time. All these idiots pushed the country a century backward.  

Khumbule · Mar 25, 2010 3:14 PM

गांडू ज्ञाने, गुलो खेलौँदै तेहि सपना देख्दै बसा ला तिमी चै ! तर यी  अनपढ़ गाउले नेपालीहरुको केही भरोषा छैना ! एदी फ्री एंड फेयर रेफेरेंदम गर्यो भने ता मुला अनपढ़ गाउलेहरुले  राजालाइ ल्यौना बेर लगौदैना जस्तो लाग्छा ! मलाई न त मुजी  कमयूनिस्ट नै मन पर्छा, न त गांडू राजतन्त्र ! अनी यी सेन्त्रिस्ट सोसिअलिस्ट कांग्रेस त गुला बराबर ! अबा आफ्नो पोलिटिकल फिलोसोफी चै अल्ट्रा ऱ्यादिकल लिबरतेरियन ! जून चै नेपाली पोलिटिकल कंसेप्टमा नै छैना ! आई एम् ओनली फॉर डाट गभरमेंट व्हू रेस्पेक्ट ड इन्दिविदुअल'स राईट तू सेल्फ डिफेन्स एंड ड राईट तू बीयेर आर्म्स !

Nas · Mar 25, 2010 5:07 PM

Gyanendra killed his family...evil will do anything for power.

8848m · Mar 25, 2010 7:44 PM

just take a sneak preview on this site /GulfTimes.com-{Latest Update: Thursday23/9/2004September, 2004, 11:21 AM Doha Time}  mends on this matters: Thousands march in Nepal against king KATHMANDU: About 15,000 people marched in the Nepali capital on Tuesday to call for the restoration of a dissolved parliament and the formation of an all-party government in the biggest protest in the city for several months. Four political parties represented in a parliament dissolved by King Gyanendra in 2002 have vowed to press ahead with their protest campaign, after it was briefly suspended for the beginning of the rainy season. “The government is a pawn in the hands of the king,” said Ghanashyam Poudel, a member of the United People’s Front, one of the four parties behind the protest. King Gyanendra fired Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba two years ago but reappointed him in June after sustained, often violent, protests by main political parties which said the constitutional monarch had grabbed power. The four parties behind Tuesday’s protest have not accepted Deuba’s reappointment, saying it was unconstitutional. Riot police put up barbed wire barricades to stop the protesters from marching on the king’s palace, as they paraded through Kathmandu carrying red and white party flags. “No to active monarchy,” read one placard carried by protesters. Some of them shouted: “We want democracy and peace.” Deuba was fired in 2002 for failing to control an insurgency by Maoist rebels, who have been fighting since 1996 to overthrow the monarchy and replace it with a communist state. In the latest violence, the army said 13 rebels were killed in several clashes on Monday and Tuesday in various parts of the mountainous country .... To the bitterness and burn-hand experience, does Nepal will rewrite history again nothings but rebel and anarchy instead of nation dev. progress..?.    hopefuly not....    

natyavaruval · Mar 26, 2010 1:36 PM

This conversation is preserved exactly as it was on the original Sajha.com and can't accept new replies.

Start a New Discussion

You might be interested in...

Recent Classifieds View all
Upcoming Events View all
Service Providers View all