A chance was given. So that peace would prosper. Even made Prime Minister, Defense minister, finance minister goddamn brought from the jungle and kept to houses. Is there anything gone out/ missed?

raju161 · Aug 1, 2009 12:45 PM

Let's suppose "maoist" is constant, now differntiating with respect to YCL, we get =Maoist *(Peace-terror) i.e. If Maiost is considered to be constant, there is no effect of YCL! And everybody want Peace so terror can be neglected. Thus, =Maoist*Peace This means, maoist can increase peace in country being positive. But right now, maiosts are in negative position, they are decreasing Peace! This solution is not entirely true coz Maoist is not constant quantity. Now, Let's consider Maoist is a variable quantity. As Maoist is a complex variable, we can break it down into two variables i.e. good maoist + bad maoist Now, we can integrate 'good maoist' from +Neutral to Peace and 'bad maoist' from Terror to -Neutral So, final solution would be, =Peace-Neutral+(-Neutral)-Terror =Peace-2Neutral-Terror This means, Maoist are combination of  Peace, Neutral and Terror people. In another word, Maoist started with Terror, attract many politically neutral people (YCL) in the name of Peace in the country! And, in order to make Peace more strong, Terror should really stop (Terror=0), Neutrals (YCL) should also vanish (Neutrals=0). 

chhimobu · Aug 1, 2009 3:22 PM

Should we apply the Ak-47 formula once again? 

raju161 · Aug 1, 2009 3:35 PM

Defintie solution is simple - HELL

Ved555 · Aug 1, 2009 3:42 PM

Indeed ved555 the definite solution sounds like hell now. But there are innocent brainwashed brothers and sisters too going to hell aong with this bestial sap heads and that's not civil. How do you feel about that? Last edited: 01-Aug-09 04:20 PM

raju161 · Aug 1, 2009 3:57 PM

dude ur wrong. upper limit of maoist is terror , lower limit is threat . peace can be constant since it doesn't change hence lie for them and always a bargaining chip for outcome.

( * )( * ) · Aug 1, 2009 5:04 PM

Okie guyzz don't drink and derive...okie Last edited: 01-Aug-09 09:34 PM

ji newah · Aug 1, 2009 9:07 PM

If you integrate this function with respect to honesty it converges to zero but if you integrate with respect to stupidity that diverges to infinity. 

grishma · Aug 1, 2009 10:03 PM

jhyamma · Aug 1, 2009 10:05 PM

Great explanation! Jhyamma. And the whole picture suggests where our political pundits are steering us (Nepalese) in the name of Peace accord. 

raju161 · Aug 2, 2009 10:34 AM