Well said not a single word to add,i wish Prachand reads sajha

newyork5154 · May 6, 2009 10:34 AM

I wish the writer would write letter to corrupt leaders: Sher B. Deuba, Girija Korila, Madhav Nepal and corrupt minded, raja badi army chief Katuwal. The leaders mentioned above had done more bad for our nation then Prachanda. If they have done better job for the country, we would not have civil war as well as Prachand and Maoist would not be exist.

rmny · May 6, 2009 10:43 AM

and rmny, what have you done ?

sojhonepali · May 6, 2009 11:54 AM

Excellent! very well said..

Bhaktaman · May 6, 2009 12:16 PM

VERY WELL SAID SAPANSANSAR. WONDERFUL

mmy · May 6, 2009 12:30 PM

Cant ignore the fact...Well Said!   Nepalithita

Nepali Thita · May 6, 2009 2:24 PM

..rmny can u explain ".... and corrupt minded, raja badi army chief Katuwal." excuse my ignorance, but ive got no clue on what wrong did he do. educate me please

nepali.chhoro · May 6, 2009 2:41 PM

Last edited: 03-Aug-09 11:41 AM

raju161 · May 6, 2009 2:47 PM

बिस्व पौडेल भाई (i.e. sapnasansar) , भनाइ त ठिकै हो तर तिमी कहिले देखी anti-maoist  भएउ हौ ? नेपाल ईन्जिनियरिङ कलेज (NEC) मा हुन्जेल त माओवादी नै थियौ । कि अमेरिका को बसाइ ले ल्याएको परिवर्तन हो ? जे होस्, तिम्रो कुरा मलाई चित्त बुज्यो ।

ANS · May 6, 2009 3:17 PM

I Don't know what this maoist leaders are trying to do . Maoist should be banned from the whole world .

Recycle Bin · May 6, 2009 8:32 PM

well done sapanasansar................................... good artical..........................................

rman · May 6, 2009 11:35 PM

nice letter..., i wish MF prachanda reads it !

ritagurung · May 6, 2009 11:47 PM

sapanasansar, one of the best article. nepal sati ley sarepeko desh bhani kura satya ho bhani kura aba chai 100% prove bhayo. we have no hope, we are in a place which leads us to couple of ways but the thing is that no of the way has a wayout. maoist the greatest curse to nepal worst than rana sasan or saha sasan. they shattered our hopes, they killed our brothers, they are plunging us into poverty. The best thing to all nepali's would have been if prachand was born in india he most probably would devide india into dont know how many countries. let's kick his ass and send him to dhoti haru ko desh.prachanda chor desh chood..... maobadi and ycl murdabad. ani nepal ko aru sabai party murdababad.. i am thinking nepal ma jay jay kar kasko garni........... pashupati nath ley nepal ko rakshya garun ......................

aajo · May 7, 2009 9:25 AM

Source : http://www.washingtontimes.com...   EDITORIAL: Nepal's Maoist double-cross A negotiated peace agreement doesn't bring peace By | Thursday, May 7, 2009 var addthis_pub="washingtontimes"; Article Comments ( 4 ) Print [-][+] Font Size E-Mail Alerts Tell a Friend Got a Question? You Report Click-2-Listen washington_ti859:http://www.washingtontimes.com... Yahoo! Buzz document.write(''); So the chairman of Nepal's Maoist radicals brags that he and his fellow-travellers tricked United Nations officials and admits that the 2006 peace deal was a sham - and gets caught on videotape doing it. The video of the recently resigned Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal, also known as Prachanda, was shot in January 2008 and just surfaced. Revealingly, he instructs his fellow communists not to be fooled by the compromises struck with Nepal's democratic government. Seizing total power, he makes clear, remains the communist goal. The latest crisis in Nepal is a useful case study in communist duplicity and instructive for those who believe that the path to peace with guerillas is cutting deals with them. The Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) joined Nepal's government after a decade-long insurgency that left more than 12,000 dead. Under terms of the 2006 Comprehensive Peace Agreement, the Maoists agreed, among other things, to cut the size of their force in half, place their weapons under U.N. supervision and participate peacefully in the political process. In the 2008 elections, the Maoists emerged as the largest party in parliament with 30 percent of the vote, and Prachanda was named prime minister. But the communists didn't consider the war really ended. The Maoists steadily maneuvered to increase their power with a view toward implementing their revolutionary agenda. The latest step was an attempt to remove Nepal Army chief Gen. Rookmangud Katawal, who had resisted Maoist demands to integrate their guerrilla army into the national force. He maintained that the "former" guerrillas are brainwashed fanatics seeking to seize control of the army. He's got a point. Nepal's President Ram Baran Yadav blocked Prachanda's move to sack Gen. Katawal. Prachandra resigned in protest. Nepal's supreme court now has the case. Prachanda says it is a question of civilian control of the military. That's rich. Meanwhile communist thugs are taking to the streets in coordinated demonstrations calling for further intervention from the U.N. The video of a relaxed Prachanda addressing his party faithful exposed the Maoists' cynical manipulation of the political system. In true communist spirit, Prachanda said that the compromises struck with the government were only tactical expediencies, and that the "bidroha," or rebellion, was still on. He joked about how they duped the United Nations Mission in Nepal (UNMIN) into thinking they had 35,000 fighters when in fact they only had 7,000 to 8,000, which allowed them to swell their ranks to 20,000 while claiming to be demilitarizing. And he confirmed Gen. Katawal's suspicions by saying it would take only a small number of his guerrillas to establish "complete Maoist control" of the Nepal Army. He added that they had not turned over their weapons as required and that relief money earmarked for the victims of the civil war would be diverted to party coffers. "You and I know the truth," he slyly told his comrades, "but why should we tell it to others?" In an unguarded moment, Prachanda revealed he is still a terrorist at heart and those who make deals with him are dupes. "Why would we abide by [the peace deal] after we win?" he said on the tape. "Why would we follow it when we have the upper hand?" The situation in Nepal and Pakistan's Swat Valley illustrate the risks in bargaining with extremists, who do not change their goals, only their methods. The lesson is important when contrasted to Sri Lanka and Colombia, where we have seen the value of taking the fight to insurgents. U.S. deal makers should understand that there is more than one way to lose a guerrilla war. Sometimes it happens with the stroke of a pen. var addthis_pub="washingtontimes";

nepaliboy111 · May 7, 2009 2:17 PM

prachanda gadha

aajo · May 8, 2009 10:10 AM