.the politically correct term is chink-paki cause we lie in between china and india

khwasa · Mar 8, 2009 6:47 PM

I would say we are  Asian.  Specifically we should fall either under Aryan or Mongolian  group depending upon our body structure.

RebelCMX · Mar 8, 2009 7:06 PM

hispanasian......thats what we fall

sajhakhozero · Mar 8, 2009 7:13 PM

 Indopali ( non mongol) and chinopali (mongol) NEPALICANO ?????

Syanjali · Mar 8, 2009 7:22 PM

we're indo-asians but the common term is asians - for all who live in asia, regardless of the typical oriental face

bhikhaari · Mar 8, 2009 10:03 PM

No Problemo Se'niors!!! Whenever I Hang out with my both White and Black friends, I just tell them: "You all talk about Black & White...But Do not mess with this Brown Man" http://sajha.com/sajha/chat/sm... Last edited: 08-Mar-09 10:26 PM

americano · Mar 8, 2009 10:26 PM

Well our race is called the MARTIAL RACE....in wikipedia.....or Born warriors agressive in Battle yet loyal, friendly and trustworthy.............That is character of a Nepali..........

MadDoGG · Mar 9, 2009 9:46 AM

Either you are Aryan or Kiratis. This history of Nepal evolve through these two Races coming to Indian-SubContinent in pre-historic times. In Nepal, Kiratis are the Indigenous people having settle along the Himalayas regions first. The Aryans later having coming from India meets the Kiratis and the two civilizations plays an important role's in shaping history and culture of India,  in which Nepal becomes the center of these two civilizations. The Kiratas in Vedic Literature. The name Kirata is for the first time found in the Yajurveda (Sukla Yajurveda, Vajasaneya, XXX, 16; also Krsna Yajurveda, Taittiriya Brahmana, III, 4,12,1). In connexion  with the Purusa-medha or 'Man-Offering' sacrifice, where a list of all kinds of human beings and animals symbolically or figuratively offered to the gods as sacrifice is given, we find the following passage:--        guhabhyah Kiratam; sanubhyo Jambhakam; paravatebhyah Kimpurusam which upon translation will read 'A Kirata, for the caves; a Jambhaka (long-toothed man?) for the slopes; a Kimpurusa (an ugly man, a wild man, an ape?) for the mountains.' Then in the Atharvaveda (X,4,14) we have a reference to a Kirata girl (Kairatika) who digs a herbal remedy on the ridges of the mountains:--        Kairatika kumarika saka khanati bhesajam:        hiranyayibhir abhribhir girinam upa sanusu. 'The young maid of Kirata race, a little damsel, digs the drug: Digs it with shovels wrought of gold on the high ridges of the hills.'                                                                               (Translation by R.T.Griffith.) "Macdonell and Keith have the following note in their Vedic Index on Kirata: 'Kirata is a name applied to a people living in the caves of the mountains, as appears clearly from the dedication of the Kirata to the caves in Vajasaneyi Samhita (also Taittiriya Brahmana), and from the reference to a Kirata girl, who digs a remedy on the ridges of the mountains. The  Manava Dharma-sastra regards the Kiratis as degraded Ksatriyas (ref. X, 44).' When a non-Aryan or foreign people is describes in an old Indian text as being of degraded Kshatriya origin, there is always an implication that they were, to some extend at least, advanced in civilisation or military organisation". -- Suniti Kumar Chatterji (KIRATA-JANA-KRTI) "The allusions to the separate family of the Kiratas (Kirata Kula) in some of the Brahmanas also indicate that they were the original inhabitants of India. Relying on the information supplied in the Vedic Samhitas and Brahmanas herein referred to it has been correctly stated that the name Kirata was applied to the aboriginal hill folk. They were the class of people, who inhabited the woods and the caves of the mountains and supported themselves by hunting. They were barbarous non-Aryan tribes representing the degraded race." --G.P Singh (The Kiratas in Ancient India)

sajhakhohero · Mar 9, 2009 12:30 PM

  ither you are Aryan or Kiratis.This history of Nepal evolve through these two Races coming to Indian-SubContinent in pre-historic times.In Nepal, Kiratis are the Indigenous people having settle along the Himalayas regions first.The Aryans later having coming from India meets the Kiratis and the two civilizations plays an important role's in shaping history and culture of India,  in which Nepal becomes the center of these two civilizations. The Kiratas in Vedic Literature. The name Kirata is for the first time found in the Yajurveda (Sukla Yajurveda, Vajasaneya, XXX, 16;also Krsna Yajurveda, Taittiriya Brahmana, III, 4,12,1). In connexion  with the Purusa-medha or 'Man-Offering' sacrifice, where a list of all kinds of human beings and animals symbolically or figuratively offered to the gods as sacrifice is given, we find the following passage:--       guhabhyah Kiratam; sanubhyo Jambhakam; paravatebhyah Kimpurusamwhich upon translation will read 'A Kirata, for the caves; a Jambhaka (long-toothed man?) for the slopes;a Kimpurusa (an ugly man, a wild man, an ape?) for the mountains.'Then in the Atharvaveda (X,4,14) we have a reference to a Kirata girl (Kairatika) who digs a herbal remedy on the ridges of the mountains:--       Kairatika kumarika saka khanati bhesajam:       hiranyayibhir abhribhir girinam upa sanusu.'The young maid of Kirata race, a little damsel, digs the drug:Digs it with shovels wrought of gold on the high ridges of the hills.'                                                                              (Translation by R.T.Griffith.)"Macdonell and Keith have the following note in their Vedic Index on Kirata:'Kirata is a name applied to a people living in the caves of the mountains, as appears clearly from the dedication of the Kirata to the caves in Vajasaneyi Samhita (also Taittiriya Brahmana), and from the reference to a Kirata girl, who digs a remedy on the ridges of the mountains. The  Manava Dharma-sastra regards the Kiratis as degraded Ksatriyas (ref. X, 44).'When a non-Aryan or foreign people is describes in an old Indian text as being of degraded Kshatriya origin,there is always an implication that they were, to some extend at least, advanced in civilisation or military organisation". -- Suniti Kumar Chatterji (KIRATA-JANA-KRTI)"The allusions to the separate family of the Kiratas (Kirata Kula) in some of the Brahmanas alsoindicate that they were the original inhabitants of India. Relying on the information supplied in the Vedic Samhitas and Brahmanas herein referred to it has been correctly stated that the name Kirata was applied to the aboriginal hill folk. They were the class of people, who inhabited the woods and the caves of the mountainsand supported themselves by hunting. They were barbarous non-Aryan tribes representing the degraded race." --G.P Singh (The Kiratas in Ancient India)

sajhakhozero · Mar 9, 2009 1:41 PM

mongrel heathen infidels   if we can't laugh at ourselves.....

Riten · Mar 9, 2009 2:38 PM