only president can make decision on tps, so tps is most probably over

AJ Joshi · Dec 27, 2018 8:57 PM

AJJoshi, I think The Secretary of Homeland Security has the discretion to decide to extend or cancel TPS, not the president. I heard in the NEWS on 116th congress Democrats wants to introduce a bill that protects DACA recipient and TPS holders. I think Democrats has full support on the house; it might pass in the house. About Senate and president, Democrats might bargain with Republican Senate and President for border wall fund. It sounds complicated but 400,000 TPS holders and 270,000 children who were born from TPS holders parents, I don't think government want to kick these people out, if they do so the economy will go downhill in some cities and states. My personal opinion, US government, should stop DV lottery program and should start giving Legal permanent status to TPS holders

halfkattu · Dec 27, 2018 9:40 PM

TPS has been terminated. So either go home or change your status. There is nothing can be done..

Gmajor · Dec 27, 2018 9:48 PM

@fullkattu ... tera bau homeland ma kaam garcha ki k ho पिचास

Oprah2020 · Dec 27, 2018 10:48 PM

Gmajor, I agree with you, Officially TPS has been terminated. But there is a saying in Nepali, "सास रहेसम्म आश हुन्छ". Not all the people have option to change the status or can return back home due to their personal reasons. My suggestion is wait until TPS offically ends. May be there will be some good news next year. Don't rely on sajha, onion news or rumors from low life creatures. See official news or USCIS website and if you can, consult with lawyers.

halfkattu · Dec 27, 2018 10:51 PM

oprah2020, you don't have to bring family in the middle of the conversation. I know you are low life creature who loves to spread rumors. Talk like a man with real logic not with the foul words.

halfkattu · Dec 27, 2018 10:59 PM

Well, tara nepal lai TPS ta jamma june samma matra cha, its all confirmed right by uscis right? With any new laws would that include/benefit nepal tps holders too?

taremam_bhai · Dec 30, 2018 5:14 PM

Lindsey Graham Floats DACA, TPS Deal in Exchange for ‘Wall’ Funding Following a working lunch with President Donald Trump on Sunday, Republican Sen. and Trump sycophant Lindsey Graham told reporters that discussions about restarting the government could center on the Bridge Act and Temporary Protected Status for immigrants in exchange for $5.7 billion in border “wall” funding. Graham, however, admitted that Trump had agreed to nothing specific during the conversation. The senator also appeared to move the goal posts on the term “wall,” which Trump has used throughout his campaign and presidency to rile his base. Graham added the term “fencing” when he referred to Trump’s “wall,” and admitted that the term was a “metaphor” for better physical security along the border. Graham’s effort to help Trump emerge from the corner he currently finds himself in due to the government shutdown comes the same day as a report that outgoing White House Chief of Staff John Kelly admitted the Trump administration never seriously considered building one giant wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. It also helps Trump weasel out of a campaign promise to force Mexico to pay for it. Graham’s comments show that negotiations between Democrats and Republicans over immigration policy could be right back where they were about a year ago. In exchange for $5.7 billion in funding for the “wall”—or whatever it is—Republicans might be willing to revisit the Bridge Act and TPS. The Bridge Act, initially proposed by Graham and Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin, among others, would grant provisional work authorization and protection from deportation for DACA recipients. It does not offer them permanent residency. These provisional protections would be mandated by Congress, rather than by the executive branch. The TPS program provides provisional residency to migrants from countries experiencing armed conflict, natural disasters, or other “extraordinary” conditions. They include Hondurans fleeing devastation from Hurricane Mitch in 1999, Salvadorans escaping destruction from two deadly earthquakes, Haitians seeking relief from the devastation caused by a 2010 earthquake, and Syrians fleeing civil war, among others. Almost immediately after taking office, the Trump administration sought to end TPS status for at-risk migrants. Revisiting the DREAM Act was not on the table, Graham said. He added that discussions over the latest proposals could start as soon as next week. “There’ll never be a 60-vote deal in the Senate that doesn’t include money for border security-slash-wall,” Graham said. “And I don’t see Democrats giving us more money unless they get something. So, the one thing we talked about is making deals.” No word, as of this writing, if Democrats would be willing to play ball with this recent offer, or if the more racist elements of the Republican Party would even go along with it. Also, everything depends on who the last person to talk in Trump’s ear is. 

tinagurung · Dec 30, 2018 9:34 PM