Saw it in someone's wall. Is it possible that the media has been lying all the time?
neurologist · Jan 22, 2017 7:50 AM · 40,135 views
yes media has been lying their ass off, Trump never claimed he surpassed Obama in 2009, all he was saying was hey ! at least it wasn't pathetic and wasn't just around 250000 that dishonest medias tried to claim. . and remember in 2009 security was more relaxed !! all he was saying is if obama in 2009 was 1.5 million , 2017 it was at least 1 million , when u take pic at lowest gathering time and compare it to obma's highest time , CNN NBC wins!! people lose !! Last edited: 22-Jan-17 08:44 AM
controversial · Jan 22, 2017 8:38 AM
"Trump never claimed he surpasses Obama in 2009" Really? Did you even watch this? https://mobile.twitter.com/Bra...
Kiddo · Jan 22, 2017 9:34 AM
This dude wanted HUGE every thing and all deplorable did not leave their houses otherwise it would have bigger than Obama. How many people used the subway and trains in 2017? 195 K vs 400K. Why Trump administration has to go after media regarding the numbers of visitors in him inauguration. IF it is less so what ? Why he has to make fuss about it? If people were paid for lodging and fooding as well trasportation may have visited by deplorable. https://www.theguardian.com/us... Last edited: 22-Jan-17 10:28 AM Last edited: 22-Jan-17 10:33 AM
MaGorkhe1 · Jan 22, 2017 10:22 AM
For sure it was not over crowded like in Obama 2009 but it was not empty like they are showing everywhere. Paid CNN , ABC, NBC never showed full crowd after they gathered .
instagram · Jan 22, 2017 10:35 AM
Really? Did you even watch this? “This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration -- period,” never said in the history of US, never said better than 2009, in fact adding, "Nobody knows the number exactly past or present", all are speculation just looking at pics and travel metro data. so could be ever or never or in between. Dishonest liberal media NYT twit started it with no. claim relying just based on pic. and hence Trump's rebuttal saying, " you scrutinize my every twit why can't I make you responsible too ?"
controversial · Jan 22, 2017 7:11 PM
यति सरल कुरा बुझ्न पनि किन यति कठिन हो साथिहरुलाई? माथि तपाइले पोस्ट गर्नु भएको तस्बिर अगाडीबाट लिईयको र media ले देखाईराखेको तस्बिर पछाडीबाट | अगाडी देखि पछाडी सम्म धेरै box हरु छन् | यसपाली अगाडिका सबै box हरु भरिएका छन् तर ओबामाको पालामा जस्तो पछाडी सम्मको सबै box हरु भरिएका छैनन् | बाटातिरका seat हरु पनि प्राय खालिनै देखिन्छन |
paladin · Jan 22, 2017 7:11 PM
Speaking later on Saturday in the White House briefing room, Mr. Spicer amplified Mr. Trump’s false claims. “This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration — period — both in person and around the globe,” he said. There is no evidence to support this claim. Not only was Mr. Trump’s inauguration crowd far smaller than Mr. Obama’s in 2009, but he also drew fewer television viewers in the United States (30.6 million) than Mr. Obama did in 2009 (38 million) and Ronald Reagan did in 1981 (42 million), Nielsen reported. Figures for online viewership were not available. Mr. Spicer said that Washington’s Metro system had greater ridership on Friday than it did for Mr. Obama’s 2013 inauguration. “We know that 420,000 people used the D.C. Metro public transit yesterday, which actually compares to 317,000 that used it for President Obama’s last inaugural,” Mr. Spicer said. Neither number is correct, according to the transit system, which reported 570,557 entries into the rail system on Friday, compared with 782,000 on Inauguration Day in 2013. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...
paladin · Jan 22, 2017 7:21 PM
https://youtu.be/PdantUf5tXg Last edited: 22-Jan-17 09:27 PM
paladin · Jan 22, 2017 9:25 PM
Raam Raam · Jan 23, 2017 3:20 AM
These pictures were taken at about the SAME time for that particular inauguration day, so to say that the picture taken during Trump's inauguration was before the crowd gathered is not true. And this is the comparison of the people rode metro: And, this is the TV audience comparison: Many major TV stations didn't even talk about the crowd size on Friday. It was Trump himself who made a big deal out of such a trivial matter. Shall we stop living in our own small comfort world of alternative reality?
Velcroid · Jan 23, 2017 10:31 AM
I think there were a lot of variables involved in the crowd factor but to be fair there were a lot of blockades made so people could not get in. To show the full traffic at obama's inauguration and show the picture that was not peak time for Trump is not same comparision. Here's a picture that refutes the CNN pictures Two screenshots which show people who couldn't get in: http://i.imgur.com/IepsikG.jpg http://i.imgur.com/01cK0JA.jpg "Trump Inauguration OVERFLOW crowd pictures" https://twitter.com/Tyrannocan... https://twitter.com/Tyrannocan...
neurologist · Jan 23, 2017 11:22 AM
I think I should give another definition to Virtual Reality: Just like for every stupid thing that happens in the world, the turnout actually was 1.5 millions just like Trump said and ALL those TV networks including the non partisan Nielsen numbers (which accurately puts FOX NEWS on top of the cable news networks for the audience numbers), and Metro numbers were part of that conspiracy -- or what our Nepali leader Girija Prasad Koirala famously used to say, "grand design." I don't know what the pictures posted were trying to prove, but the security fencing that was installed around the National Mall for the inauguration had seven check points and there was NO magnetometers on the National Mall or that there was any difficulty getting to the national mall...all according to the Secret Service. And the same building picture..well, I thought the building does look smaller if the picture is taken from the distance. "The Party told you to reject all evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -George Orwell Last edited: 23-Jan-17 12:02 PM
Velcroid · Jan 23, 2017 12:00 PM
Trump admin's #AlternativeFacts https://www.youtube.com/watch?... His #AlternativeFacts
Burga-Flippa · Jan 23, 2017 9:17 PM
Instead of arguing who's big just understand there is no scientific method to very anybody's claim. so no one is right or wrong to precision. But this wasn't the only issue, the MLK statue removal fake news was another Trump has complained but surprisingly no medias at all talks about it since they know they are fuked up big. All fake liberals news claims Trump's fascinated with numbers and rating but not an attempt that they failed big to portray him as racist.. what dishonest time we live in !! only this election opened my eyes wide. Last edited: 24-Jan-17 09:24 AM
controversial · Jan 24, 2017 9:22 AM
Fake news alert! Fake news alert!! Fact check for dummies:
Velcroid · Jan 24, 2017 11:01 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Velcroid · Jan 24, 2017 12:19 PM
It is surprising and as well thinking of mental status of US President talking about the crowd. I think it is childish talk like talking and comparing how many friends and family were in my 10th birthday. When is he going to graduate from Kindergarten talk and behavior as well? While I was in college , college elect president was very bad on delivering his message and speeches. Couple month later he improved a lot and it was amazing. But Trump was in campaign since 2015 and attended and delivered hundreds of speeches by now he should have grown up and act like a president. How you say the same sentence gives different meaning. ला खाआआ ( it sounds like throwing food to pets) ला खा ( more polite and genuinely asking) We can not do anything other than expressing our concern but it would be better if mr. Trump acts as a leader of the world not as a owner of Trump Tower business. So my point is you are not a Trump business owner but the world leader and act accordingly. Bill Clintons inauguration had the record, 29 millions. Total Viewer / Population and availability of News media. You take it this way the value of a dollar in 1993 and 2017 will not be the same. Therefor his inauguration was globally watched. How many of you got it " Alternative Facts"? I think very few did. People used for Satire. Last edited: 25-Jan-17 08:28 AM
magorkhe1 · Jan 25, 2017 7:51 AM
LOL guys, why do you care so much how many fools gather in some body's inauguration? How does it matter there were 1 or 1 billion fools there clapping for Trump or Obama?
paradox · Jan 25, 2017 8:19 AM
Now this baby is bringing new bombshell and spending Tax payer money on Voter Fraud. What evidence he has " because he believes on Fraud" though it is "Alternative facts" As this presidents is fool or making us fool and we are acting according to his tweet or words. Last edited: 25-Jan-17 12:00 PM
MaGorkhe1 · Jan 25, 2017 9:49 AM
"LOL guys, why do you care so much how many fools gather in some body's inauguration?" Just as much care that brought you here to comment on our comments! Not even an ounce more! :)
Velcroid · Jan 25, 2017 11:59 AM
This conversation is preserved exactly as it was on the original Sajha.com and can't accept new replies.
Start a New Discussion