UK should cut aid to Nepal if "endemic" corruption persists: report BY KIERAN GUILBERT LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Britain should cut its 86 million pound ($128 million) aid budget for Nepal unless the country acts to combat poor governance and "endemic" corruption, a parliamentary committee said on Friday. Britain is the largest bilateral donor to Nepal which is one of the world's poorest nations with a quarter of its 28 million population living below the poverty line, according to the World Bank. Funding from Britain's development aid ministry, the Department for International Development (DFID), has helped Nepal make progress in health, water and sanitation in the nine years since it ended a decade-long civil war. But this spending will only be justified if governance improves, according to the International Development Committee (IDC), a parliamentary committee that monitors the performance of DFID. DFID should also address the needs of women and girls in Nepal, who are at risk of trafficking, early marriage, domestic abuse and murder, by working to change social norms and ensure justice for victims, the IDC said in a report. "Nepal suffers from poor governance, and corruption is endemic," committee chairman Malcolm Bruce said in a statement. "If Nepal is to become less corrupt, improvements in governance and a change of culture have to be made to state institutions." Britain passed a bill earlier this month to commit to spending 0.7 percent of its gross national income on aid each year. It met the target for the first time last year - spending 11.4 billion pounds on overseas aid - making it the first G7 country to meet the U.N. target. DFID's aid budget for Nepal increased to 86 million pounds in 2014/15 from 55.9 million pounds in 2012/13 for building roads, reforestation and disaster risk reduction. But corruption is an concern in the Himalayan nation wedged between China and India. Nepal was ranked 126th out of 175 countries in watchdog Transparency International's global corruption perception index last year, down from 116 in 2013. The committee said working with local non-governmental organizations instead of the state was not a solution, as both are "prone to corruption in a corrupt society". The committee called on DFID to provide support for female members of parliament and parliamentary committees and back local elections through existing government programs to avoid further corruption. It praised the aid ministry for providing technical support for plans to build two major hydro-electric schemes that aim to address Nepal's chronic power shortages. "If traditional political problems are overcome and these schemes are successful, the Nepalese economy could be transformed and DFID could begin to develop an exit strategy," Bruce said. In response to the IDC report, DFID said it had a zero tolerance approach towards corruption and that supporting girls and women was at the heart of its work. "We are heavily involved in preventing gender-based violence by working with communities and the police, as well as tackling other barriers faced by women and girls through skills programs and reproductive health services," a DFID spokeswoman said in a statement. (Reporting By Kieran Guilbert, Editing by Alex Whiting and Belinda Goldsmith)
cybernepali · Mar 27, 2015 8:13 AM · 2,362 views
Actually nepal should not accept any financial help from European country. Britain shameless country, they are begging India to accept help and they are blackmailing Nepal for this. If Nepal asks them to stop helping Nepal, they will beg for it. Majore part of the help from them returns to them and rest is used to convert people to Christianity.
paradox · Mar 27, 2015 4:11 PM
no nay country should fund Nepal as those funds never go to people but the politicians so stop helping us
divorceguy · Mar 27, 2015 11:52 PM
the main problem is that our society is getting more and more corrupt and we are getting used to it as if it were a norm. the political impunity and social immorality will take us down. despite the 2 neighbours growing so ast economically, we have failed to snatch this opportunity .it is much easier for nepal to actually progress in presences of such favourable situation in the region.
shiva_linga · Mar 29, 2015 2:46 PM
This conversation is preserved exactly as it was on the original Sajha.com and can't accept new replies.
Start a New Discussion