look how one can so easily distort history and propagete his own agenda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
shiva_linga · Mar 10, 2015 4:48 AM · 1,598 views
Thanks to a Wikipedia, Free Encyclopedia, anyone who register can add the content.That is why unless and untisl there is reliable reference for every claim made no one trust the content. Beofre Mithila,people had content about Limbuwaan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L... similarly in wikipedia there is content about Kochila http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T... there are overlaping claims about same place. Although it seems like maihali was the first group of people who seteled in Organised way, Tharus were there before them. so why not Tharuhat ? whose history we want to rpeserve, whose Identtity we want to preserve? land belongs to planet earth . Land does not belongs to any partticaular race, religion or culture. That is why provinces based on ethenic identity is not scienticfic. Therefore, First, Region should have identity of which group or which part should have identity of which group should decided by the groups who have made claims. In this case, Limbuwaan, mithila and tharu ppl Second, Maithil ppl claim pahadi ppl are destroying their identity, but the wikipedia article says only 5%of ancient maithali is in Nepal, 95% maitahli is in India then why not separate Mithilanchal in India? In India too, Hindi has dominated maitahli for centuraies, ( more than in Nepal) but in India the call for separate mithila state is not that strong. then why in Nepal? Hindi dominated, hindi speaking ppl dominated Maitahli is ok then why they have problem in Nepal? These are logical questions maithali ppl have to answer. having said that, personally I dont have any oppossition to name a state in Nepal as "Mithila". They just have to agree to no special tretment to any language, religion and ethnicity. Every one should have equal rights How they settle the problem of Limbuwaan, Kochila ( Kochula ppl claim than maithali dominated them for centuries and many tharus adopted to mathali language because of their dimination.) here again, when they dominte kochila tharu language , its ok. But in Modern time when communication is very important, using nepali language as a language of communicatiob is domination? it is double standard. Last edited: 10-Mar-15 07:37 AM
_____ · Mar 10, 2015 5:46 AM
This conversation is preserved exactly as it was on the original Sajha.com and can't accept new replies.
Start a New Discussion