I filled DV 2012 for my brother where I mentioned that he has dependent which is his wife.After he got his first letter , he submitted all the documents to KCC office at Kentucky. Then he got his second letter which also has his wife name in 'beneficiaries '.Things got twisted when he appeared on interview last week where first and foremost he was asked about his marriage. He been told that he apply as 'single' and his document says he was already married a year (2011) before the application date and claimed to be fake marriage. He been told he cant get visa and try 'DV lottery' again. We are very disappointed and trying to figure out what we have missed or it's them who just simply rejected without further investigating it. Here are few things that came in my mind. As I mentioned, there is my sister in law's name in beneficiary so doesn't that tells that he is married ? Is KCC supposed to cross check the information submitted during the application and one after the first letter. My assumption is my brother is not supposed to get the second letter if there was mismatch in martial status or any stats. I also have no clue why he told him to try for lottery again if its fake and fraudulent . As rule says it permanent denial if someone make fake or fraudulent approach. Its very disappointing that he spent so much time and money on it and everything went in vain. My curiosity is despite what had happened, is there anything we can do so this case can be reviewed or taken for consideration or it would be better just to move on. Do you think contacting KCC office would worth trying? All suggestions and comments are appreciated. sapphires
sapphires · Jan 15, 2014 2:34 AM · 12,568 views
u can email KCC and tell eveything in short and clearly. i hope they respond. there must be some way.
kale99 · Jan 15, 2014 11:04 AM
Communicate with the consulate, if things does not work out you can file the writ of mandamus depending on consulate's response. Bandita Sharma-Dahal, Esq. http://www.philadelphiaimmigra... The information contained herein is for informational purposes only as a service to the public, and is not legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel, nor does it constitute advertising or a solicitation.
Attorney Bandita · Jan 15, 2014 11:20 AM
Oho Namaste bandita mam! :)
itroll · Jan 15, 2014 11:29 AM
This conversation is preserved exactly as it was on the original Sajha.com and can't accept new replies.
Start a New Discussion