Your whole assumption is wrong. "The only source of money is government." I guess you didn't put too much of thought before saying this and I hope you are open for a clear discussion on this. Not only this statement is untrue, but a large part of income that most people earn come from sources outside of the government. Let's try a simple example; say you are an artist in Nepal and want to sell your art in India. One of the merchant in India pays you top rupees for you art and now you are a millionaire. Did Nepal Government give you any money? International trade is a big factor of income for not just citizens but for governments as well.

Kiddo · Nov 18, 2013 3:46 PM

So kiddo goes to Qatar and starts working on the construction of the World cup stadium for which he gets some qatari rial printed by the government of Qatar. Then kiddo sends to his father and he gets rupees aand buys a house. The qatari rial is then used by nepal to buy oil. In this case the qatari rial got extended to nepal but the person who paid did not print himself. So the scenario just moves from nepal to qatar but the source of money for the qatari boss isalso government. joseph works in best buy and gets paid in dollars which is printed by the government of USA, best buy does not print dollar itself.

mancini · Nov 18, 2013 7:17 PM

mancini, I hope you started this thread with a genuine interest on topic not with a vested interest of promoting an agenda of 'big government'. I hope you have read and heard an extreme real-life example of  'big government'. I mean the command and control economy of former USSR where government itself tried to create job for each and every individual. Back to the topic, if you want an expansionary monetary policy by the government through the Central bank, i ask you to think what happens if "too much money is chasing too few goods".

nepalilaure · Nov 18, 2013 8:10 PM

You latter post tells me at least you are not as naive as your first post stated. But still, your rebuttal doesn't jive with what you stated earlier. You blamed it on the Government for Nepali people not having money. Now you are saying source of money for qatari boss is also Government; are you then blaming Qatari government for Nepali not having money? Hope you agree it just doesn't make sense. Ofcourse a government prints money, no other entity has the right to do so (except if you're a BitCoin enthusiast, that's a different topic). But you cannot say people have no other source than Government to get the money.

Kiddo · Nov 18, 2013 8:42 PM

kiddo: what i am trying to say is Nepali government is responsible for the failure of nepalese people or else they would not have to go to qatar for work. This is what happens when people with no brains are in the government. Shameless nepali government has no response even when there's so report out there about the plight of nepalese people in foreign countries. nepalilaure: I am not saying that government has to be big handed but there's so much more a government can facilitate for the development of the people. Government should be the biggest facilitator but this is not the case in Nepal.

mancini · Nov 19, 2013 12:22 PM

निस्टाबान सरकार अनि निस्टाबान कर्मचारी अनि तेस्तै जनता भए रामायणमा उल्लेख गरिएको राम राज्य जस्तो हुने थियो | माचिनीले : सरकार लाइ दोस दिने भन्दा हामि आफैलाई दोस दिउ  : तपाइँ हामीले के नै गर्यौ ? इन्टरनेट मा बसेर राजनीति गर्ने बाहेक ? अर्थसास्त्रकै कुरामा क्यापिटल मात्रै हैन श्रम प्रबाह  एक देश मात्रै सिमित नरहने कुरा बुझ्नु भएको रहेनछ : देशमा बिदेसी रोजगारमा पठाउने सरकार हो कि तपाइँ हाम्रै दाजु भाइ हुन् ? घरमा घाम तापेर बस्ने भन्दा विदेश गई हरियो नोट लाएको देखी सबै दौडेका छन् अनि मुसालाई हात्ती बनाएर बिदेस पठाउने सरकार हैन हामि जनता नै हौ |  सबै दोस सरकारलाई नोट जति हाम्रो बैक मा :

magorkhe1 · Nov 23, 2013 8:45 PM

Nepalese ppl are responsible for their own failure..... still living as if it were Rana kalin ( 2007 agadi)

forgotpassword · Nov 23, 2013 10:50 PM