India and Nepal both underachievers

Archived from the original Sajha.com — preserved as posted, replies can no longer be added here.
Start a New Discussion
Archived Post

Below is a comment by the famous investor Jim Rogers on India. I think it applies to specially Nepal as Nepal has been more mismanaged than India. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In 1947, India was one of the most successful countries in the world relative to others. India was more successful than China, more successful than South Korea, more successful than most places in Asia—but, for me, it is unfortunate that you have failed to take advantage of some of your most valuable assets.  India has some of the smartest people in the world, but it does not have an education system to support it. Infrastructure is equally poor. So, I don’t know if India would have been better without a democracy, and some of the greatest periods in history have been without democracy. But these are just my observations, and it is the Indians who must decide what they want. via Jim Rogers blog -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

nagan · Sep 11, 2013 3:33 PM · 9,630 views

1 Reply

Does this mean we need to be bring Monarchy back in Nepal ? Last edited: 11-Sep-13 05:04 PM

nagan · Sep 11, 2013 5:05 PM

This conversation is preserved exactly as it was on the original Sajha.com and can't accept new replies.

Start a New Discussion

You might be interested in...

Recent Classifieds View all
Upcoming Events View all
Service Providers View all