These vulture politicians have no right to even think about selling a national property. Whose conceited idea was it? We need to find out the vultures responsible for entertaining this idea so that they can pocket the money.

rethink · Apr 29, 2013 10:07 AM

This idea has been floated in the past numerous times. So far the idea has been rejected. They aren't actually selling the house itself (as Nepal Government/Embassy doesn't own it), but the lease on the house for 60 more years. I wish there were a provision on the lease agreement that said if the lease is transferred/sold, then the minimal rent (1000 pound) becomes void. More than a political party, it's the broker involved that should be blamed. Nepali govt should reject the idea.

Kiddo · Apr 29, 2013 12:29 PM

Last edited: 10-Dec-19 07:32 AM

freedom2012 · Apr 29, 2013 12:53 PM

Nooo...why would anybody try to gain from the sale?

Kiddo · Apr 29, 2013 2:42 PM