For me it is a non sense talk. I don't know who is the photographer. By the way who has the authority to take is single picture without any authority. What is the motive of taking is personal picture? Has he been paid to take his picture? You can easily say you can file copyrights cases but don't you know that protection of privacy ? You can not invade on someone's privacy also without their consent. So I think it does not make any sense other than claiming that you took his picture nothing else.