Addendum to my earlier post: If there's no coordination between the state and the people (majority/minority), then no matter how good of a constitution any given country has, the country is still undemocratic because there's no way to restrict the leaders from committing unconstitutional actions. And the leaders tend to cross the boundries in the third world countries because of the division in the population. So whether Repulicanism, constitutional monarchy or a liberal democracy, things will continue to be messy in Nepal if the transition is without taking care of the division and coordination issues.