Judge Judy has been asked to judge this case.

After looking at all evidence presented and video of skype interview of the defendant, this case is dismissed on grounds of non issue.

More than any criminal offense, this case seems to be centered on intention of offense. While the defendant may be guilty of harboring bad intention, the court cannot pass judgement on bad intentions without keeping into account what exactly constitutes bad intention?

Does a male person who is attracted to a female person constitutes a bad intention? If that is the case then everyone who finds another person from opposite sex attractive should be guilty of having bad intention. Let's break it down a bit. When a male is attracted to a female, what is the attraction for? Does he want to get married? Is the attraction sexual? Would there be any attraction if there was no sexual intentions?

One has to consider the whole gamut of natural attraction before condemning someone's intention. This whole allegation is based on the defendant's intention so a question might arise would the lady find anyone attracted to her guilty of sexual harassment if they try to flirt with her? What about when she is ready to get married to any man? Would she be guilty of sexual harassment if she flirts with any guy? Let's face it the foundation of attraction lies in one's sexuality. So it becomes hypocritical to accuse anyone of sexual harrassment for their mere attraction.

It would be different if there was any unwanted physical contact.

Case dismissed!